Gaymark Investments v Walter Construction Group
| Jurisdiction | Northern Territory |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Judge | Bailey J |
| Judgment Date | 20 December 1999 |
| Neutral Citation | [1999] NTSC 143 |
| Docket Number | FILE NO: Nos. LA5 of 1999 (9907030) and LA6 of 1999 (9910874) |
| Date | 20 December 1999 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
- Daya CMT Sdn Bhd v Yuk Tung Construction Sdn Bhd
-
CIS General Insurance Ltd v IBM United Kingdom Ltd
...time at large. Reliance was placed on the Australian decision in Gaymark Investments Pty Limited v Walter Construction Group Limited [1999] NTSC 143. That argument was rejected by the learned judge at [103]: “I have considerable doubt that Gaymark represents the law of England. Contractual ......
-
Steria Ltd v Sigma Wireless Communications Ltd
...... DISTRICT REGISTRY TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT BIRMINGHAM CIVIL JUSTICE CENTRE QUEEN'S ... the conflicting Australian authorities ( Turner , Gaymark and Peninsula ), the decision of the Court of Session in ......
-
Diamond Glass Enterprise Pte Ltd v Zhong Kai Construction Co Pte Ltd and another appeal
...relied on the Australian case of Gaymark Investments Pty Ltd v Walter Construction Group Ltd (formerly Concrete Constructions Group Ltd) [1999] NTSC 143 (“Gaymark”) to make the point that because ZK had caused delay during the three alleged delay periods in the procurement of the cabin glas......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Liquidated Damages ' Post-Termination And Gaymark
...relied on the Australian case of Gaymark Investments Pty Ltd v Walter Construction Group Ltd (formerly Concrete Constructions Group Ltd) [1999] NTSC 143 ("Gaymark") to say that "because ZK had caused delay during the three alleged delay periods ... ZK is not entitled to LD notwithstanding D......
-
Prevention principle restated: Contractors be aware - Owners, head contractors and local governments be wary
...be a mistake, however, because of a precedent case called Gaymark Investments Pty Ltd v Walter Construction Group Ltd (1999) 16 BCL 449, [1999] NTSC 143. In that case, the owner was denied liquidated damages after having deleted all standard-form provisions for extensions of time and replac......
-
Singapore Appellate Court Confirms Validity Of Delay Liquidated Damages On Termination
...for delays it had caused. Diamond Glass relied on the Australian case of Gaymark Investments Pty Ltd v Walter Construction Group Ltd [1999] NTSC 143, which stood for the proposition that if an employer is responsible for project delays, a contractor's failure to properly apply for an extens......
1 books & journal articles
-
Preface to the first edition
...is the decision of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory in Gaymark ( Gaymark Investments Pty Ltd v Walter Construction Group Ltd [1999] NTSC 143 at [69] (16 BCL 449; 21 Const LJ 71)), which has excited considerable interest both in England and Australia as to the efectiveness of time......