Generate Group Pty Ltd v Harris

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date08 June 2023
Neutral Citation[2023] FCA 605
Date08 June 2023
CourtFederal Court


Federal Court of Australia


Generate Group Pty Ltd v Harris [2023] FCA 605

File numbers:


NSD 1124 of 2022NSD 196 of 2023



Judgment of:

STEWART J



Date of judgment:

8 June 2023



Catchwords:

CORPORATIONS – where liquidator purported to assign choses in action pursuant to a heads of agreement and deed of assignment – where court approval required under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where assignee commenced proceedings before court approval sought or granted – principles governing retrospective approval – interests of creditors and the proper administration of companies in liquidation



PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary dismissal –whether assignment without court approval effective as regards third parties – whether proceedings commenced before approval a nullity – effect of granting approval nunc pro tunc



Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 477(2)(d), 477(2B), 506(1)(b), 506(1A)(a), 1322(4)(a)

Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) r 2.13(1)

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 16.53, 16.54



Cases cited:

BHP Coal Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2014] FCAFC 138; 226 FCR 240

Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor [1996] HCA 25; 186 CLR 541

Byers v Overton Investments Pty Ltd[2001] FCA 760; 109 FCR 554

Corporate Affairs Commission v ASC Timber Pty Ltd (1998) 29 ACSR 109

Deigan v Fussell[2019] NSWCA 299

Empire (Aust) Nominees Pty Ltd v Vince [2000] VSC 324; 35 ACSR 167

Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Kassem[2012] FCAFC 124; 205 FCR 156

Hall v Poolman[2009] NSWCA 64; 75 NSWLR 99

Hamilton, in the matter of ACN 101 634 146 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014] FCA 687

Hayes, in the matter of Dingham Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] FCA 2053

HIH Casualty[2002] NSWSC 1036

Hundy (liquidator), in the matter of 3 Property Group 13 Pty Ltd (in liq)[2022] FCA 1216

In the matter of Golden Sands Hospitality Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2)[2017] NSWSC 450

In the matter of Kevin Jacobsen Pty Ltd (in liq)[2016] NSWSC 538

In the matter of Octaviar Ltd (in liq)[2015] NSWSC 1621; 110 ACSR 72

In the matter of One.Tel Ltd[2014] NSWSC 457; 99 ACSR 247

Lord Corporation Pty Ltd v Green (1991) 22 NSWLR 532

Martin Bruce Jones as liquidator of Forge Group Ltd (recs and mgrs. apptd) (in liq) v Sun Engineering (Qld) Pty Ltd [2017] WASC 195

Re Ambient Rail Pty Ltd (in liq); Ex parte Tonks[2019] FCA 1556

Read, in the matter of Forestview Nominees Pty Ltd[2007] FCA 1985; 164 FCR 237

Rolfe v Investec Bank (Aust) Ltd [2014] VSCA 38

Stewart, in the matter of Newtronics Pty Ltd[2007] FCA 1375

Stone v ACE-IRM Insurance Broking Pty Ltd [2003] QCA 218; [2004] 1 Qd R 173

Williams v Spautz[1992] HCA 34; 174 CLR 509



Division:

General Division



Registry:

New South Wales



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

Corporations and Corporate Insolvency



Number of paragraphs:

79



Date of hearing:

30 May 2023



Counsel for the Plaintiff in NSD1124/2022

B Lloyd



Solicitor for the Plaintiff in NSD1124/2022

Swaab Attorneys



Counsel for the First, Second and Fifth Defendants in NSD1124/2022

N Kabilafkas



Solicitor for the First, Second and Fifth Defendants in NSD1124/2022

Wilson & Co Lawyers



Counsel for the Third, Fourth and Sixth Defendants in NSD1124/2022

S B Docker and J Li



Solicitor for the Third, Fourth and Sixth Defendants in NSD1124/2022

Thomson Geer



Counsel for the Plaintiffs in NSD196/2023

J Parrish



Solicitor for the Plaintiffs in NSD196/2023

Maddocks




ORDERS


NSD 1124 of 2022

BETWEEN:

GENERATE GROUP PTY LTD ACN 702 667 228

Plaintiff


AND:

GREGORY JOHN HARRIS

First Defendant


MARK ANDREW GRIFFITHS

Second Defendant


SINT PTY LTD ACN 135 128 237 (and others named in the Schedule)

Third Defendant



order made by:

STEWART J

DATE OF ORDER:

8 JUNE 2023



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The interlocutory application by the third, fourth and sixth defendants lodged for filing on 17 March 2023 be dismissed.

  2. The interlocutory application by the first, second and fifth defendants lodged for filing on 29 March 2023 be dismissed.

  3. The costs of the interlocutory applications referred to in orders 1 and 2 be reserved.

  4. Sandra Drew and Secom Technology Pty Ltd ACN 161 035 276 be joined as the seventh and eighth defendants respectively.

  5. Within seven days of these orders, the plaintiff file and serve an amended originating process giving effect to the joinder referred to in order 4 and a statement of claim.

  6. The parties jointly arrange a listing for further case management and the hearing of submissions on the reserved costs.


Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.



ORDERS


NSD 196 of 2023

BETWEEN:

MALI AGNES KAINONA THAGGARD IN HER CAPACITY AS LIQUIDATOR OF SEA-TECH AUTOMATION PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 003 916 434

First Plaintiff


SEA-TECH AUTOMATION PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 003 916 434

Second Plaintiff


AND:

GREGORY JOHN HARRIS

First Interested Person


MARK ANDREW GRIFFITHS

Second Interested Person


SEA-TECH SYSTEMS PTY LTD ACN 614 267 140 (and others named in the Schedule)

Third Interested Person



order made by:

STEWART J

DATE OF ORDER:

8 JUNE 2023



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. Pursuant to s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the plaintiffs be authorised nunc pro tunc to enter into:

    1. the heads of agreement dated 5 December 2022, a copy of which is at tab 5 of exhibit MT-1 to the affidavit of Mali Agnes Kainona Thaggard affirmed on 28 February 2023; and

    2. the deed of assignment dated 9 December 2022, a copy of which is at tab 6 of exhibit MT-1 to the affidavit of Mali Agnes Kainona Thaggard affirmed on 28 February 2023.

  1. The costs be reserved.

  2. The plaintiffs and interested parties jointly arrange a listing, with a listing in NSD1124/2022, for hearing submissions on costs.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

STEWART J:

Introduction
  1. There are several applications in two separate proceedings before me. In the one proceeding (NSD196/2023), the liquidator of Sea-Tech Automation Pty Ltd seeks approval, nunc pro tunc, under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) of her entry into a heads of agreement and deed of assignment with Generate Group Pty Ltd in terms of which she assigned various claims of Sea-Tech to Generate. The...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex