Georgiadis v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date1994
Neutral Citation[1994] HCA 6,1994-0309 HCA A
Year1994
Date1994

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
77 cases
6 books & journal articles
  • Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...Commission v Tooth & Co Ltd (1979) 142 CLR 397, 403 (Barwick CJ); Georgiadis v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (1993) 179 CLR 297, 320 (Toohey J). In relation to s 117 (rights of out-of-State residents) see Street v Queensland Bar Association (1989) 168 CLR 461, 527 (......
  • The Functional Constitution: Re-Reading the 2014 High Court Constitutional Term
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 43-3, September 2015
    • 1 September 2015
    ...Tooth & Co Ltd (1979) 142 CLR 397, 408 (Barwick CJ). 138 See, eg, Georgiadis v Australian and Overseas Telecommuni cations Corporation (1994) 179 CLR 297, 305–6 (Mason CJ, Deane and Gaudron JJ) (‘Georgiadis’); Health Insurance Commission v Peverill (1994) 179 CLR 226, 237 (Mason CJ, Deane a......
  • “A Puny Thing Indeed”1—Cheng V the Queen and the Constitutional Right to Trial by Jury
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 29-1, March 2001
    • 1 March 2001
    ...Bank of NSW v Commonwealth (1948) 76 CLR 1 at 349-350 per Dixon J; Georgiadis vAustralian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (1994) 179 CLR 297 at 305 per MasonCJ, Deane and Gaudron 114 Federal Law Review Volume 29____________________________________________________________________......
  • Trade marks for tobacco products as constitutional property: Australian plain packaging legislation
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...goods or services and61JT International supra note 7 paras 41–4, citing Georgiadis v Australian OverseasTelecommunications Corporation (1994) 179 CLR 297 at 304–5 per Mason CJ, Deane andGaudron JJ, 315 per Dawson J, 320–1 per Toohey J.62Commonwealth v Tasmania (Tasmanian Dam Case) (1983) 15......
  • Get Started for Free