Gibbons v Wright

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1954] HCA 17,1954-0423 HCA B
Date1954
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
75 cases
  • Low Geok Khim (administratrix of the estate of Low Kim Tah, deceased) v Low Geok Bian and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 10 March 2006
    ...What constitutes sufficient mental capacity to do an act? I adopt the answer given by the High Court of Australia in Gibbons v Wright (1954) 91 CLR 423 at 438 [T]he mental capacity required by the law in respect of any instrument is relative to the particular transaction which is being effe......
  • Chemsource (M) Sdn Bhd v Udanis bin Mohammad Nor
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Masterman-Lister v Brutton; Masterman-Lister v Jewell
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 January 2003
    ...present in any particular case would depend on the nature of the transaction. The cases were reviewed by the High Court of Australia in Gibbons v Wright (1954) 91 CLR 423. Sir Owen Dixon, in a passage at page 438, to which Mr Nourse QC referred in In re Beaney, decd, (ibid, at page 774D), s......
  • D (by His Proposed Litigation Friend, F) v S
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Protection
    • 1 March 2023
    ...case would depend on the nature of the transaction. The cases were reviewed by the High Court of Australia in Gibbons v Wright (1954) 91 CLR 423. Sir Owen Dixon, in a passage at page 438, to which Mr Nourse QC referred in In re Beaney, decd, (ibid, at page 774D), stated the principle in the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Tutors, costs and risks ' Litigation and the incapable in NSW
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 3 June 2020
    ...Rappard v Williams [2013] NSWSC 1279 at [71]-[81] (Hallen J). 11A v A [2015] NSWSC 1778; BC201511602 at [76]-[79]. 12Gibbons v Wright (1954) 91 CLR 423; BC5400600 at CLR 437; see also Guthrie v Spence (2009) 78 NSWLR 225; [2009] NSWCA369 at [174]-[175] (Campbell JA); Azar vKathirgamalingan ......
3 books & journal articles
  • A TALE OF TWO CAPACITIES
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2022, March 2022
    • 1 March 2022
    ...74 For a good summary of the existing principles, see Fehily v Atkinson [2017] Bus LR 695 at [76]–[103]. See also Gibbons v Wright (1954) 91 CLR 423 at 438, per Dixon CJ, Kitto and Taylor JJ and Hoff v Atherton [2003] EWCA Civ 1554; [2005] WTLR 99 at [33]. 75 [2010] 4 SLR 373. 76 Chee Mu Li......
  • FAMILY FIDUCIARIES IN THE PROTECTIVE JURISDICTION.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 1, August 2020
    • 1 August 2020
    ...Department of Health and Community Services (NT) v JWB (1992) 175 CLR 218, 266 (Brennan J) ('Marion's Case'); Gibbons v Wright (1954) 91 CLR 423, 437-8 (Dixon CJ, Kitto and Taylor JJ); CJ v AKJ (2015) 16 ASTLR 24, 28-30 [17]-[29] (Lindsay J) ('CJ'); P v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2015] NSWSC......
  • Human rights, older people and decision making in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Elder Law Review No. 9, January 2015
    • 1 January 2015
    ...South Wales, 'A Practical Guide for Solicitors: When a client's capacity is in doubt' (Law Society of New South Wales, 2009) 21. (13) (1954) 91 CLR 423. (14) see Victorian Law Reform Commission, 'Guardianship Final Report 24' (Victorian Law Reform Commission, 2012), ch7 for an outline of va......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT