Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v Hurrell
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Neutral Citation | [1982] HCA 15,1982-0421 HCA B |
| Year | 1982 |
| Date | 1982 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
35 cases
-
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing)
...seeks to prove, “it is not possible to attain entire satisfaction as to the true state of affairs”: Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v Hurrell (1982) 149 CLR 155 (at 169 per Mason J). 1898 In such a case, the law does not require proof to the “entire satisfaction” of the tribunal of fact: see Transp......
-
Jadwan Pty Ltd v Rae & Partners (A Firm)
...to prove, “it is not possible to attain entire satisfaction as to the true state of affairs”: Girlock (Sales) Pty. Ltd. v. Hurrell (1982) 149 C.L.R. 155 at 169, per Mason J. In such a case, however, the law does not require proof to the “entire satisfaction” of the tribunal of 446 To prove ......
-
Cummins v the Trustees of the Property of John Daniel Cummins¸ A Bankrupt
...Fullagar and Kitto JJ; Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 at 304–305 per Dixon CJ, 310 per Menzies J, 318–319 per Windeyer J; Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v Hurrell (1982) 149 CLR 155 at 161–162 per Stephen J, 168 per Mason J; Anikin v Sierra (2004) 79 ALJR 452 at 459–460 [45]–[46] per Gleeson CJ......
-
Quintis Ltd (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy Number B0507N16FA15350
...NSWCA 350 General Reinsurance Corporation v Forsakringsaktiebolaget Fennia Patria [1983] QB 856 Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v Hurrell (1982) 149 CLR 155 Halford v Price (1960) 105 CLR 23 Hall (Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer [1992] 1 WLR 939 Harris v Smith [2008] NSWSC 545; (2008) 14 BPR 26,223 H......
Get Started for Free