Goldberg v Ng

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1995-1103 HCA B,[1995] HCA 39
Date1995
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
122 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Experts and legal professional privilege
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • May 12, 2013
    ...then there may be a waiver of privilege (Attorney General for the Northern Territory v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475; Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83; Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1). Waiver of privilege with respect to expert witnesses will arise because the expert evidence on which a party ......
  • Audits: preserving legal privilege when auditors request information
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • June 22, 2022
    ...dismissed in Westpac Banking Corporation v 789Ten Pty Ltd (2005) [2005] NSWCA 321). 5 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1. 6 Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83. 7 [2020] NSWSC 8 In the matter of Northern Energy Corporation Limited [2020] NSWSC 1073 at [70] and [83]. 9 In the matter of Northern Ene......
3 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-4, December 2005
    • December 1, 2005
    ...Holdings SA v Patel[2000] 1 WLR 272 ........................... 199, 200Georgia v McCollum, 505 US 42 (1992) ....301Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83, HCA......................................................... 299–300Good Luck, The [1992] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 540 ...194Gorman v Newton, ex p. Newto......
  • Disqualification of Judges and Pre-Judicial Advice
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 43-2, June 2015
    • June 1, 2015
    ...In Osland v Secretary individual waives privilege by bringing proceeding against his or her legal adviser (see, eg, Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83). However, such an approach would have the potential to interfere with a party's choice as to whether to bring proceedings, or even whether to ......
  • Noticeboard
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-4, December 2005
    • December 1, 2005
    ...wasmade in pursuance of a public duty. They also dismissed an alternative argumentbased on Australian authority (Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83, HCA) that waivershould be imputed on the grounds of fairness because the defendant hadcommunicated the documents to the Stock Exchange in order t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT