Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gaudron J,McHugh J,Gummow,Hayne JJ,Kirby J,Callinan J
Judgment Date05 December 2002
Neutral Citation2002-1205 HCA A,[2002] HCA 54
Docket NumberS258/2001 S261/2001
Date05 December 2002
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
186 cases
  • Attorney-General v Strathboss Kiwifruit Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 9 April 2020
    ...(No 1), above n 179, at [122]–[124]. Reliance was also placed on other biosecurity cases such as Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan [2002] HCA 54, (2002) 211 CLR 540; and Regent Holdings Pty Ltd v State of Victoria [2013] VSC 208 Referring to The Grange, above n 147, at [158]. 209 High C......
  • Miller v Miller
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 April 2011
    ...Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16 at 29 per Mason J; [1986] HCA 1; Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002) 211 CLR 540 at 596 [145] per Gummow and Hayne JJ; [2002] HCA 54. 81 (2002) 211 CLR 540 at 596 [145]. 82 (1970) 119 CLR 397 at 418. 83 (1970) 119 CLR 397 ......
  • Nominal Defendant v Glg Australia Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 5 April 2006
    ...Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 21 at 47–50 [66]–[72]. 73Woods v Multi-Sport Holdings Pty Ltd (2002) 208 CLR 460 at 495–496 [114]; Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002) 211 CLR 540 at 568–569 [52]–[53]; Gattellaro v Westpac Banking Corporation (2004) 78 ALJR 394 at 406 [78]–[79]; 204 ALR 258......
  • Imbree v McNeilly; McNeilly v Imbree
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 28 August 2008
    ...[1998] HCA 5; Crimmins v Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee (1999) 200 CLR 1; [1999] 200 CLR; Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002) 211 CLR 540; [2002] 211 47Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 at 464 per Mason J. See now Pyrenees Shire Council v Day (1998) 192 C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • My view of Food Poisoning Law in Australia and New Zealand
    • Australia
    • LexBlog Australia
    • 8 September 2010
    ...More information is available at http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/21/2932535.htm Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan 211 CLR 540; 77 ALJR 183; 125 LGERA 1; 194 ALR 337 More information is available at: http://home.iprimus.com.au/foo7/badfood.html 2003 WL 21921167 [2003] More Inf......
5 books & journal articles
  • The Law of Bureaucratic Negligence in South Africa: A Comparative Commonwealth Perspective
    • South Africa
    • Acta Juridica Nbr. , August 2019
    • 15 August 2019
    ...Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd & Another v Ryan& Others; Ryan v Great Lake Council & Others; State of New South Walesv Ryan & Others (2002)211 CLR 540 at 564 where, in a representative action, a group of consumers who contractedthe hepatitis Avirus after eating oysters harvested from a lake......
  • Judicial Review of Migration Decisions: Life after S157
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2002) 117 FCR 212, 231, 236; Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Great Lakes Council (2002) 211 CLR 540, 609 [183]. For cases in which the relevant jurisdictional fact was a 'fact' in the objective sense, see Corporation of the City of Enfield v......
  • The Australian High Court and Social Facts: A Content Analysis Study
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 40-3, September 2012
    • 1 September 2012
    ...by expert witnesses. For example, see Swain v Waverley Municipal Council (2005) 220 CLR 517; Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002) 211 CLR 540. In addition, during the course of this study I reviewed the High Court files for the matters which led to the decisions in Cattanach v Melch......
  • Will the High Court ‘WAKIM’ Chapter II of the Constitution?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...that an accused did not have a common law right to be represented at public expense. See also Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002) 194 ALR 337, 340–1 [6]–[7] (Gleeson CJ) decisions on allocation of revenue cannot be reconsidered by courts in an assessment of whether the government's......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT