Graham v Baker

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1961-0811 HCA B,[1961] HCA 48
Year1961
Date1961

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
110 cases
  • Sydney Refractive Surgery Centre Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Zarkovic Stanko v Owners of the Ship or Vessel `MARA`
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 1 September 2000
    ... ... The test is by purpose rather than by cause ... The case of Graham v Baker [1961] 106 CLR 340 is another decision of the High Court of Australia on the point under consideration. There, the plaintiff, who at the ... ...
  • Coleman and MacDonald v Smith
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 24 September 1979
    ... ... under the terms of his service contract, then it is said the plaintiff has not lost them and so can't recover. either. See for example Graham v. Baker [1961] 106 C.L.R. 340 and Browning v. War Office (supra). However if the employer lays them as purely voluntary payments, or perhaps has ... ...
  • Csr Ltd v Eddy
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 21 October 2005
    ...Dawson JJ; Grincelis v House (2000) 201 CLR 321 at 332–333 [25]-[28] per Kirby J and 338–343 [50]-[60] per Callinan J. 57Graham v Baker (1961) 106 CLR 340 at 347 per Dixon CJ, Kitto and Taylor JJ; Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1995) 182 CLR 1 at 5 and 18 per Deane, Dawson,......
  • Get Started for Free