Griffith University v Tang

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gummow,Callinan,Heydon JJ,Kirby J
Judgment Date03 March 2005
Neutral Citation2005-0303 HCA A,[2005] HCA 7
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberB19/2004
Date03 March 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
111 cases
15 books & journal articles
  • Government liability in negligence.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 32 No. 1, April 2008
    • 1 April 2008
    ...Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), which applies only to decisions under an enactment: s 3. See Griffith University v Tang (2005) 221 CLR 99, 121-4, 130-1 (Gummow, Callinan and Heydon JJ); M Aronson, 'Private Bodies, Public Power and Soft Law in the High Court' (2007) 35 Federal La......
  • Griffith University V Tang, ‘Under an Enactment’ and Limiting Access to Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-3, September 2005
    • 1 September 2005
    ...the Victorian scheme: see Mark Aronson, Bruce Dyer and Matthew Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (3rd ed, 2004) 22-3. 7 (2005) 213 ALR 724 ('Griffith'). 526 Federal Law Review Volume 33 ____________________________________________________________________________________ The m......
  • Private Bodies, Public Power and Soft Law in the High Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-1, March 2007
    • 1 March 2007
    ...and suggestions, and for their references to material which I would otherwise have missed. 1 (2003) 214 CLR 1. 2 (2003) 216 CLR 277. 3 (2005) 221 CLR 99. 2 Federal Law Review Volume 35 ____________________________________________________________________________________ consensual arrangemen......
  • The use and Enforcement of Soft Law by Australian Public Authorities
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-1, March 2014
    • 1 March 2014
    ...on whether their creation has bee n expressly _____________________________________________________________________________________ 4 (2005) 221 CLR 99 ('Tang'). 5 Stephen Argument, 'Qua si-legislation: Greasy Pig, Trojan Horse or Unruly Child?' (1994) 1(3) Australian Journal of Administrat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT