Griffith University v Tang

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gummow,Callinan,Heydon JJ,Kirby J
Judgment Date03 March 2005
Neutral Citation2005-0303 HCA A,[2005] HCA 7
Docket NumberB19/2004
Date03 March 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
91 cases
11 books & journal articles
  • Griffith University V Tang, ‘Under an Enactment’ and Limiting Access to Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 33-3, September 2005
    • 1 September 2005
    ...the Victorian scheme: see Mark Aronson, Bruce Dyer and Matthew Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (3rd ed, 2004) 22-3. 7 (2005) 213 ALR 724 ('Griffith'). 526 Federal Law Review Volume 33 ____________________________________________________________________________________ The m......
  • The use and Enforcement of Soft Law by Australian Public Authorities
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 42-1, March 2014
    • 1 March 2014
    ...on whether their creation has bee n expressly _____________________________________________________________________________________ 4 (2005) 221 CLR 99 ('Tang'). 5 Stephen Argument, 'Qua si-legislation: Greasy Pig, Trojan Horse or Unruly Child?' (1994) 1(3) Australian Journal of Administrat......
  • Private Bodies, Public Power and Soft Law in the High Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 35-1, March 2007
    • 1 March 2007
    ...and suggestions, and for their references to material which I would otherwise have missed. 1 (2003) 214 CLR 1. 2 (2003) 216 CLR 277. 3 (2005) 221 CLR 99. 2 Federal Law Review Volume 35 ____________________________________________________________________________________ consensual arrangemen......
  • ‘Australian Exceptionalism’ in Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 36-1, March 2008
    • 1 March 2008
    ...and this has resurfaced in the recent case of Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1, 45-6 [140]–[141] (Callinan J). 106 [1983] 2 AC 629, 636. 107 (2005) 221 CLR 99 ('Tang'). 108 See Daniel Stewart, 'Griffith University v Tang, "Under an Enactment" and Limiting Judicial Review' (2005) 33 Federal La......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT