Griffiths v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1977] HCA 44,1977-0817 HCA A
Date1977
Year1977

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
203 cases
  • R v House
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • R v Hilbach
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 18 September 2020
    ...requires different outcomes in cases that are different in some relevant respect”) (emphasis in original) & Griffiths v. The Queen, [1977] HCA 44; 137 C.L.R. 293, 326 per Jacobs, J. (“Disparity of sentencing standards is a very serious deficiency in a system of criminal [26] The Queen v......
  • DPP v Cunningham
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 8 October 2002
    ...v. Egan 2 I.L.R.M. 299 Hardiman J., giving the judgment of the court, stated at p. 307, having reviewed Griffithsv. The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293, The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v. Thomas McCormack CCA [2000] 4 I.R. 356 Director of Public Prosecutions v. Byrne [1995] 1 ILRM 2......
  • Green v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 December 2011
    ...challenge. Since, in my opinion, neither of those grounds was established, I would have dismissed the appeals. 1 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 at 310 per Barwick CJ; [1977] HCA 44; Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 at 300 per Brennan, Deane, Dawson and Gaudron JJ; [1994] HC......
  • Get Started for Free