Griffiths v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1977] HCA 44,1977-0817 HCA A
Year1977
Date1977
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
237 cases
  • R v House
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • R v Hilbach, 2020 ABCA 332
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 18 septembre 2020
    ...requires different outcomes in cases that are different in some relevant respect”) (emphasis in original) & Griffiths v. The Queen, [1977] HCA 44; 137 C.L.R. 293, 326 per Jacobs, J. (“Disparity of sentencing standards is a very serious deficiency in a system of criminal [26] The Queen v......
  • DPP v Cunningham
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 8 octobre 2002
    ...v. Egan 2 I.L.R.M. 299 Hardiman J., giving the judgment of the court, stated at p. 307, having reviewed Griffithsv. The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293, The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v. Thomas McCormack CCA [2000] 4 I.R. 356 Director of Public Prosecutions v. Byrne [1995] 1 ILRM 2......
  • Lacey v Attorney-General of Queensland
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 avril 2011
    ...1912 (NSW) conferred an unlimited or unfettered jurisdiction on the Court of Criminal Appeal was rejected by two of the Justices in Griffiths v The Queen38 as a misunderstanding of what had been said in Whittaker39. It was also inconsistent with the principle, derived from the common law's ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT