Gumana (on behalf of the Yarrwidi Gumatj and other groups) v Northern Territory of Australia (No NTD6035 of 2002)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Year2005
Date2005
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
17 cases
  • Malone v State of Queensland (The Clermont-Belyando Area Native Title Claim) (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 Diciembre 2021
    ...FCA 430 Gudjala People No 2 v Native Title Registrar (2008) 171 FCR 317; [2008] FCAFC 157 Gumana v Northern Territory of Australia (2005) 141 FCR 457; [2005] FCA 50 Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v State of Western Australia (No 9) (2007) 238 ALR 1; [2007] FCA 31 Henderso......
  • Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 18 Octubre 2019
    ...FCA 903; 165 FCR 300 Griffiths v Northern Territory [2007] FCAFC 178; 165 FCR 391 Gumana v Northern Territory of Australia [2005] FCA 50; 141 FCR 457 Hayes v Northern Territory [1999] FCA 1248; 97 FCR 32 Hayes on behalf of the Thalanyji People v State of Western Australia [2008] FCA 1487 He......
  • Northern Territory of Australia v Arnhem Land Aboriginal Land Trust
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 30 Julio 2008
    ...shall provide for the right of Aboriginals to enter such land in accordance with Aboriginal tradition’. 9Gumana v Northern Territory (2005) 141 FCR 457 at 472 10 (2005) 141 FCR 457 at 462 [2]–[3]. 11 (2005) 141 FCR 457 at 478 [69]. 12 (2005) 141 FCR 457 at 483 [73]. 13 (1999) 101 FCR 171 . ......
  • Gumana v Northern Territory of Australia
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 2 Marzo 2007
    ...Act 1910 (Cth) Director of Fisheries (NT) v Arnhem Land Aboriginal Land Trust (2001) 109 FCR 488 cited Gumana v Northern Territory (2005) 141 FCR 457 cited Commonwealth v Yarmirr (2000) 101 FCR 171 not followed Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1970) 17 FLR 141 cited Risk v Northern Territory (2......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • The Definition and Discovery of Facts in Native Title: The Historian's Contribution
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 36-3, September 2008
    • 1 Septiembre 2008
    ...these _____________________________________________________________________________________ 36 Gumana v Northern Territory of Australia (2005) 141 FCR 457, 494 [128], 493 [120] (cf at common law) (Selway J). See also Gumana v Northern Territory of Australia (2007) 158 FCR 359, 383[127] (Fre......
  • The Crown's radical and native title: lessons from the sea:.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 35 No. 3, December 2011
    • 1 Diciembre 2011
    ...shore between high and low-water marks and that part of rivers and estuaries that is affected by the tides: Gumana v Northern Territory (2005) 141 FCR 457, 462 [3], 469 [31] (Selway J). It includes 'the foreshore' (the shore between high and low-water marks: at 469 [31], 476 [61]) and the '......