H G v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1999] HCA 2,1999-0209 HCA A
Year1999
Date1999
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
181 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Expert evidence in New South Wales
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 September 2021
    ...process adopted in their report which has ultimately led to the formation of the opinion in the subsequent report: HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414 at [39]-[44], Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 at [42] and Morgan v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 257 at It is through this process of r......
  • Expert evidence in New South Wales
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 September 2021
    ...process adopted in their report which has ultimately led to the formation of the opinion in the subsequent report: HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414 at [39]-[44], Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 at [42] and Morgan v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 257 at It is through this process of r......
9 books & journal articles
  • The Definition and Discovery of Facts in Native Title: The Historian's Contribution
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 36-3, September 2008
    • 1 September 2008
    ...JJ). 90 Velevski v The Queen (2002) 76 ALJR 402, 416 [82] (Gaudron J), 426–7 [153]–[158] (Gummow and Callinan JJ); HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414, 427 [40] (Gleeson CJ), 432 [58] (Gaudron J). 91 (1998) 43 NSWLR 364, 371. Young J's decision was followed by Hely J in Jones v Scully (2002) ......
  • Expert Evidence of Delay in Complaint in Childhood Sexual Abuse Prosecutions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 10-3, July 2006
    • 1 July 2006
    ...Law Review 1019, n. 54. 23 Bonython (1984) 38 SASR 45 at 46–7, SASC, approved in Velevski (2002) 187 ALR 233 at [82], HC Aust; HG (1999) 197 CLR 414 at 431–2, HC Aust; Osland (1998) 197 CLR 316 at 336, HC Aust; and adopted by theNew Zealand Court of Appeal in Makoare [2001] 1 NZLR 318 at [2......
  • Without Fear or Favour? Trends and Possibilities in the Canadian Approach to Expert Human Behaviour Evidence
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 10-4, July 2006
    • 1 July 2006
    ...Evidence—United Kingdom, Australia, UnitedStates’ (2004) 8 E & P 248.In Australia, the leading case is HG vThe Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414. SeealsoAustralian Law Reform Commission et al.,Uniform Evidence Law (Australian Government PrintingService: 2006), for a helpful description of the curren......
  • The Basis of the ‘Basis Rule’: The Role of the Basis Rule in the Admissibility of Expert Opinion
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 43-2, June 2015
    • 1 June 2015
    ...below at Parts III-C and IV respectively. 45 (2001) 52 NSWLR 705. 46 Makita (2001) 52 NSWLR 705, 731–2 [64] (references omitted). 47 (1999) 197 CLR 414 [39] (emphasis added), cited in Makita (2001) 52 NSWLR 705, 742 [84]. 322 Federal Law Review Volume 43 ____________________________________......
  • Get Started for Free