Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-929-605-4013

Habib v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2)

Cited authorities 34 Cited in 14 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date2009
Neutral Citation2009-0313 FCA D
Date2009
Year2009
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Habib v Australia [Australia, Federal Court]
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 25 February 2010
    ...that there was a triable issue as to whether the doctrine applied and that the matter should proceed: Habib v. Commonwealth (No 2)UNK(2009) 175 FCR 350; 254 ALR 250; [2009] FCA 228 at [80][82]. Somewhat exceptionallybut, it is to be emphasised, with the consent of Mr Habibthe Commonwealth t......
  • Habib v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Chiu Teng @ Kallang Pte Ltd v Singapore Land Authority
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 November 2013
    ...of the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 (folld) H 156, The [1999] 2 SLR (R) 419; [1999] 3 SLR 756 (refd) Habib v Commonwealth (No 2) (2009) 254 ALR 250 (not folld) Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v AG [2013] 1 SLR 619, HC (folld) Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v AG [2014] 1 SLR 345, CA (folld) Lee Hsien Lo......
  • Aye v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
    • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Reconceptualising ‘Justiciability’: Crafting a Coherent Framework for Australia’s Unique Constitutional Context
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 50-3, September 2022
    • 1 September 2022
    ...224 CLR 322, 351 [30] (Gleeson CJ).65. Re Ditfort (n 11) 369.66. For judicial support of Re Ditfort, see Habib v Commonwealth (No 2) (2009) 175 FCR 350 (‘Habib (No 2)’); Thorpe (n6); Hicks v Ruddock (2007) 156 FCR 574 (‘Hicks’); Stewart v Ronalds (2009) 76 NSWLR 99, 112 [42]–[43] (Allsop P)......
  • Reconceptualising ‘Justiciability’: Crafting a Coherent Framework for Australia’s Unique Constitutional Context
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 50-3, September 2022
    • 1 September 2022
    ...224 CLR 322, 351 [30] (Gleeson CJ).65. Re Ditfort (n 11) 369.66. For judicial support of Re Ditfort, see Habib v Commonwealth (No 2) (2009) 175 FCR 350 (‘Habib (No 2)’); Thorpe (n6); Hicks v Ruddock (2007) 156 FCR 574 (‘Hicks’); Stewart v Ronalds (2009) 76 NSWLR 99, 112 [42]–[43] (Allsop P)......
  • Public Trusts, Public Fiduciaries
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 38-3, September 2010
    • 1 September 2010
    ...Land Trust (2008) 236 CLR 24; but cf Bonyhady, above n 73, 251–53; see also Akiba v Queensland (No 2) [2010] FCA 643 at [777]–[846]. 82 (2009) 175 FCR 350. 83 56 Fed Cl 720 (2003). 84 My own view is outlined in 'The Fiduciary Principle' in Timothy G Youdan (ed), Equity, Fiduciaries and Trus......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT