Hamilton v Oades
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Neutral Citation | [1989] HCA 21,1989-0412 HCA A |
| Date | 1989 |
| Year | 1989 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
153 cases
- De Vonk v Commissioner of Taxation
- Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings Ltd v Bluescope Steel Ltd
- Spatialinfo Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd
-
Roering NO and Another v Mahlangu and Others
...NNO 1991 (3) SA 717 (C): referred toSimmons, NO v Gilbert Hamer & Co Ltd 1963 (1) SA 897 (N): referred to.AustraliaHamilton v Oades [1989] HCA 21 ((1989) 166 CLR 486; 85 ALR 1;15 ACLR 123): referred toHong Kong Bank of Australia Ltd and Others v Murphy and Others (1992)8 ACSR 736 (NSW SC CA......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Nobody Expects The Inquisition: High Court Of Australia Opens The Door To Extraordinary Public Examination Powers To Potential Class Action Plaintiffs And Beyond
...[2017] FCAFC 91 (Foster, Wigney and Markovic JJ). 4. Walton at [60] and [78] (Kiefel CJ and Keane J), citing Hamilton v Oades (1989) 166 CLR 486 at 5. Walton at [51] (Kiefel CJ and Keane J), citing Rees v Kratzmann (1965) 114 CLR 63 at 80. 6. See, eg, Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW......
2 books & journal articles
-
Prosecutorial Discretion and Judicial Review: An Analysis of Recent Canadian and South African Decisions
...v Spautz (n 53) 509. 83 Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Co Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197 at 242–243, 246–247. 84 Hamilton v Oades (1989) 166 CLR 486 at 502; Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 174 CLR 509 at 526–530, 532–537, 553–556. 85 As much as the courts in Nigeria recognise that abuse of cou......
-
CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO BE PRESUMED INNOCENT AND THE RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION
...Research)(1990) 67 DLR (4th) 161. 65(1983) 152 CLR 281 at 293–293, per Gibbs CJ. 66HKSAR v Lee Ming Tee(2001) 4 HKCFAR 133 at 166E. 67 (1989) 166 CLR 486. 68 Hamilton v Oades and Corporate Affairs Commission of New South Wales (1989) 166 CLR 486 at 496. 69 [1911] 3 AC 212. 70 [2000] 2 AC 41......
