Harrington-Smith on behalf of Wongatha People v Western Australia (No 7)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 2003-0820 FCA B |
| Date | 2003 |
| Year | 2003 |
| Court | Federal Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
38 cases
- Jango v Northern Territory of Australia (No 2)
-
Ford v Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3)
...Font v Paspaley Pearls [2002] FMCA 142 Hall v A & A Sheiban Pty Ltd & Ors (1989) 20 FCR 217 Harrington-Smith v Western Australia (No 2) (2003) 130 FCR 424; [2003] FCA 893 Hassell v Adelaide Magistrates Court [2008] SASC 132 Hoyle v The Queen (2018) 339 FCR 11; [2018] ACTCA 42 Hughes trading......
- Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Islanders of the Regional Seas Claim Group v Queensland (No 2)
- Risk v Northern Territory of Australia
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Messages from Canada - Should lawyers be able to suggest changes to their experts draft reports?
...7 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) 6 - Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v Western Australia (No 7) [2003] FCA 893 (20 August 2003) [at Sources: Moore v. Getahun, 2014 ONSC 237 Rule 53.03, Canadian Rules of Civil Procedure Canadian Bar Association commentary h......
-
Leave it to the experts ' a lawyers role in the preparation of an expert report
...Ltd v Leung [2022] FCA 722, McElwaine J at [76]. 11 Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v State of Western Australia (No 7) [2003] FCA 893, Linden J at 12 Rule 212(2) of the UCPR; see also Landel Pty Ltd & Anor v Insurance Australia Limited [2021] QSC 247, Dalton J at [19] and......
4 books & journal articles
-
The Definition and Discovery of Facts in Native Title: The Historian's Contribution
...FCA 1548 (Unreported, Cooper J, 1 November 2000) [1]–[16]; Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v Western Australia (No 7) (2003) 130 FCR 424, 431–2 [35]–[39] (Lindgren J). 2008 Definition and Discovery of Facts in Native Title 313 ______________________________________________......
-
The Basis of the ‘Basis Rule’: The Role of the Basis Rule in the Admissibility of Expert Opinion
...(1984) 38 SASR 45, 46 (King CJ). 148 See Dasreef (2011) 243 CLR 588, 639 [133]; Harrington-Smith v Western Australia (No 2) (2003) 130 FCR 424, 428–9 [25]. On the relevance point, see also Odgers, above n 92, 344 [1.3.4320]. 149 (2001) 52 NSWLR 705, 744–5 [86]. 150 [2012] FCA 252 (19 March ......
-
AUSTRALIAN HISTORIANS AND HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE COURTROOM.
...it should be noted that this is a case on the Stolen Generations, rather than native title; Harrington-Smith v Western Australia [No 7] (2003) 130 FCR 424, 433 [42] (Lindgren J) ('Harrington-Smith'), discussed later in this article: see below nn 15-16 and accompanying (5) (1951) 83 CLR 1 ('......
-
Judging Surveys: Experts, Empirical Evidence and Law Reform
...added). 76 Ibid 6–7. See Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v Western Australia (No 2) ('Wongatha' Judgment No 7) (2003) 130 FCR 424, 427–8 [19]; Jango v Northern Territory (No 2) [2004] FCA 1004 [9]. 77 Ibid 113. 78 Ibid 145. 118 Federal Law Review Volume 33 ________________......