Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 4)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date22 December 2022
Neutral Citation[2022] FCA 1575
Date22 December 2022
CourtFederal Court


Federal Court of Australia


Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 4) [2022] FCA 1575

File number:


VID 1277 of 2017VID 237 of 2022



Judgment of:

MIDDLETON J



Date of judgment:

22 December 2022



Catchwords:

BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – action for debt brought by companies in liquidation and liquidator against numerous respondents – matters of principle common to various claims determined in “liability trial” – orders made reflecting reasons as to liability – refusal of relief sought by applicants under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) Sch 2 s 90-15 – refusal of declaratory relief sought by applicants – dismissal of claims seeking amounts drawn down under bank guarantees or return of bank guarantees – dismissal of claims found to be statute-barred because of limitation period – dismissal of claims no longer pressed by applicants


CORPORATIONS –action for debt brought by companies in liquidation and liquidator against numerous respondents – matters of principle common to various claims determined in ‘liability trial’ – orders made reflecting reasons as to liability – refusal of relief sought at liability trial by liquidator under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) Sch 2 s 90-15 – refusal of declaratory relief sought by applicants – dismissal of claims seeking amounts drawn down under bank guarantees or return of bank guarantees – dismissal of claims found to be statute-barred because of limitation period – dismissal of claims no longer pressed by applicants


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – declaration sought by applicants – declaration refused – issue subject of sought declaration not pleaded and not a real controversy in dispute


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 54A – consideration of referral of questions to a referee – potential necessity for prior determination of evidentiary issues – Kadam v MiiResorts Group 1 Pty Ltd (No 4) (2017) 252 FCR 298; [2017] FCA 1139 considered


COSTS – application by respondents for costs forthwith of liability trial and for costs on indemnity basis – submission that applicants’ claims in wilful disregard of clearly established law – Calderbank offers or offers of settlement made – held: costs in respect of dismissed claims ordered to be paid forthwith on ordinary basis, with reservation of rights to pursue costs on indemnity basis for respondents who made Calderbank offers or offers of settlement


CORPORATIONS – winding up by the court – ss 459A and 467B of Corporations Act – application for order for winding up by the court where company already being wound up voluntarily – stay sought by applicants – held: application dismissed



Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)



Cases cited:

Ainsworth v Criminal justice Commission(1992) 175 CLR 564

Ajkay v Hickey & Co Pty Ltd[2011] NSWSC 822

Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Ltd v ACPA Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 112

Australasian Conference Assoc Ltd v Mainline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq)(1978) 141 CLR 335

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich (2009) 236 FLR 1; [2009] NSWSC 1229

Australian Securities Commission v Melbourne Asset Management Nominees Pty Ltd(1994) 49 FCR 334; [1994] FCA 1031

Calderbank v Calderbank[1975] 3 All ER 333

Carter v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2020) 279 FCR 83

Chocolate Factory Apartments Ltd v Westpoint Finance Pty Ltd[2005] NSWSC 784

Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd(1993) 46 FCR 225

CPB Contractors Pty Limited v Celsus Pty Limited (formerly known as SA Health Partnership Nominees Pty Ltd) (No 2) (2018) 268 FCR 590; [2018] FCA 2112

Dale v Clayton Utz (No 3) [2013] VSC 593

Energy Beverages LLC v Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd (No 2)[2022] FCA 394

Farrow Finance Co Ltd (in liq) v ANZ Executors and Trustees Co Ltd (1997) 23 ACSR 521

Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International BV (No 5) [2018] FCA 19

Fiduciary Ltd v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 1;[2002] NSWSC 432

Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421

Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Limited v International Produce Merchants Pty Limited(1988) 81 ALR 397

Gothard v Davey (No 2) (2011) 277 ALR 172

Gye v McIntyre (1991) 171 CLR 609

Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Forge Group Power Pty Ltd (in liq) (receivers and managers appointed) [2017] WASC 152; (2017) 52 WAR 90

Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Forge Group Power Pty Ltd (in liq) (Receivers and Managers appointed) [2018] WASCA 163; (2018) 53 WAR 325

Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 3)[2022] FCA 1280

Hume v Munro (No 2) (1943) 67 CLR 461

Kadam v MiiResorts Group 1 Pty Ltd (No 4) (2017) 252 FCR 298; [2017] FCA 1139

McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd[1999] FCA 1639

Melbourne City Investments Pty Ltd v Treasury Wine Estates Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 116

Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd (2012) 203 FCR 520; [2012] FCA 558

Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd (No 2)[2012] FCA 559

Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Limited v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (No 2)[2020] FCA 1093

Re Clay; Clay v Booth (1919) l Ch 66

Richmond v Ora Gold Ltd[2020] FCA 70

Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v British Bank for Foreign Trade Ltd(1921) 2 AC 438

Setka v Abbott[2013] VSCA 376

Sheehan v Lloyds Names Munich Re Syndicate Ltd[2017] FCA 1340

Stone v Ebeid[2020] FCA 343

Toowoomba Foundry Pty Ltd v Commonwealth(1945) 71 CLR 545

VoR Environmental Australia Pty Limited v Taset Inc (No 2) (2019) 385 ALR 312; [2019] FCA 1094



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Victoria



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

Corporations and Corporate Insolvency



Number of paragraphs:

151



Date of last submissions:

7 December 2022



Date of hearing in VID 1277 of 2017:

15-18, 22-24 and 29 March 2022, 4, 21-22 and 26 April 2022, 11 and 13 May 2022, 5 July 2022 and 23 November 2022



Date of hearing in VID 237 of 2022:

13 May 2022, 5 July 2022 and 23 November 2022



In VID 1277 of 2017:

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex