Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date15 June 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 647
CourtFederal Court
Date15 June 2021


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 647

File number:

TAD 19 of 2020



Judgment of:

MORTIMER J



Date of judgment:

15 June 2021



Catchwords:

CONSTITUTIONAL LAWConstitution s 51(xix) – ratio decidendi of the decision in Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3; 94 ALJR 198 – content of the tripartite test in Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1 – application of the Mabo (No 2) test – where applicant is a non-citizen who identifies as an Aboriginal Australian



Legislation:

Constitution, ss 51(xix), 51(xxvi)

Migration Act 1958 (Cth)

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), s 223



Cases cited:

ACCC v Pratt (No 3) [2009] FCA 407; 175 FCR 558

Agius v State of South Australia (No 6) 2018 FCA 358.

Attorney-General (Cth) v Queensland [1990] FCA 358; 25 FCR 125

Australian Broadcasting Corporation and Others v Chau Chak Wing [2019] FCAFC 125; 271 FCR 632

Bodney v Bennell [2008] FCAFC 63; 167 FCR 84

Cherokee Nation v Georgia 30 US 1

Chetcuti v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 42; 95 ALJR 1

Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs [1992] HCA 64; 176 CLR 1

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Kojic [2016] FCAFC 186; 249 FCR 421

Commonwealth v Tasmania [1983] HCA 21; 158 CLR 1

Commonwealth v Yarmirr [2001] HCA 56; 208 CLR 1

Cunliffe v Commonwealth [1994] HCA 44; 182 CLR 272

De Rose v State of South Australia [2003] FCAFC 286; 133 FCR 325

Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Thomas [2016] VSCA 237; 315 FLR 31

Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103; 197 FCR 261

Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; In re Yates [1925] HCA 53; 37 CLR 36

Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Gayle [2019] NSWCA 172; 100 NSWLR 155

Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; 230 CLR 89

Gibbs v Capewell [1995] FCA 25; 54 FCR 503

Hackett (a pseudonym) v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2020] NSWCA 83; 379 ALR 248

Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 266; 87 NSWLR 609

Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1872

Hepples v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [1992] HCA 3; 173 CLR 492

Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Australian Branch trading as Liberty Specialty Markets [2020] FCA 1493

King-Ansell v Police [1979] 2 NZLR 531

Long v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1422

Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3; 375 ALR 597

Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1

McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 416

McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 223

Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58; 214 CLR 422

Ngarluma Aboriginal Corporation v Ramirez [2018] FCA 1900; 364 ALR 94

Obeid v Lockley [2018] NSWCA 71; 98 NSWLR 258

Perara-Cathcart v The Queen [2017] HCA 9; 260 CLR 595

Pochi v MacPhee [1982] HCA 60; 151 CLR 101

Re Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Minister for; Ex parte Te [2002] HCA 48; 212 CLR 162

Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51; 207 CLR 391

Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 [2004] HCA 49; 225 CLR 1

Risk (on behalf of the Larrakia People) v Northern Territory and Others (No NTD 5 of 2006) [2007] FCAFC 46; 240 ALR 75

Risk v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 404

Sampi v Western Australia [2010] FCAFC 26; 266 ALR 537

Sandy v Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation (No 4) [2018] WASC 124; 126 ACSR 370

Shaw v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 72; 218 CLR 28

Shaw v Wolf [1998] FCA 389; 83 FCR 113

Tasmania v Victoria [1935] HCA 4; 52 CLR 157

Wagonga Local Aboriginal Land Council v Attorney General of New South Wales [2020] FCA 1113

Webster v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 702; 277 FCR 38



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Tasmania



National Practice Area:

Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights



Number of paragraphs:

347



Date of last submissions:

3 February 2021



Date of hearing:

11-12 February 2021



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr S J Keim SC with Ms C J Klease



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Sentry Law



Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr S Lloyd SC with Mr C Tran



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor



Counsel for the Intervener:

Ms R Webb QC with Dr R Cunningham and Mr T Goodwin



Solicitor for the Intervener:

King & Wood Mallesons



ORDERS


TAD 19 of 2020

BETWEEN:

KENRICK HENARE HELMBRIGHT

Applicant


AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

Respondent



MELYTHINA TIAKANA WARRANA (HEART OF COUNTRY) ABORIGINAL CORPORATION

Intervener



order made by:

MORTIMER J

DATE OF ORDER:

15 JUNE 2021



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1. The application be dismissed.

2. On or before 4 pm on 29 June 2021 the parties file agreed orders in relation to costs.

3. In the absence of any agreement pursuant to order 2, on or before 4 pm on 6 July 2021 each party have leave to file any written submissions as to costs, limited to three pages.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT


MORTIMER J:

INTRODUCTION

1 This proceeding raises important questions arising out of the High Court’s decision in Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3; 375 ALR 597 (Love/Thoms) and the majority finding (at [81]) that

Aboriginal Australians (understood according to the tripartite test in Mabo (No 2)) are not within the reach of the “aliens” power conferred by s 51(xix) of the Constitution.

2 The applicant, Kenrick Henare Helmbright, seeks a declaration that he is not an alien for the purposes of s 51(xix) of the Constitution. He is a non-citizen. He...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 12 August 2021
    ...(No 2) [2015] HCA 53; 90 ALJR 270 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 647 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1872 Johnston v Cameron [2002] FCA......
  • Hobson v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 14 April 2022
    ...Guo v Commonwealth [2017] FCA 1355 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 647 Jerrard (Deceased), Re Estate [2018] NSWSC 781; 97 NSWLR 1106 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; 101 CLR 298 Lacey (a pseudonym) v Attorney Gener......
  • Hirama v Minister for Home Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 15 June 2021
    ...v Tasmania [1983] HCA 21; 158 CLR 1 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 647 Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3; 375 ALR 597 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1 Manado (on behalf of......
  • Dhu v Karlka Nyiyaparli Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 29 November 2021
    ...[2019] FCAFC 177; 273 FCR 350 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 647 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Australian Branch trading as Liberty Speciality Markets v Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 126 Mabo v Queensl......