Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 15 June 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] FCA 647 |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Date | 15 June 2021 |
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 647
|
File number: |
TAD 19 of 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Judgment of: |
MORTIMER J |
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment: |
15 June 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – Constitution s 51(xix) – ratio decidendi of the decision in Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3; 94 ALJR 198 – content of the tripartite test in Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1 – application of the Mabo (No 2) test – where applicant is a non-citizen who identifies as an Aboriginal Australian |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Constitution, ss 51(xix), 51(xxvi) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), s 223 |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
ACCC v Pratt (No 3) [2009] FCA 407; 175 FCR 558 Agius v State of South Australia (No 6) 2018 FCA 358. Attorney-General (Cth) v Queensland [1990] FCA 358; 25 FCR 125 Australian Broadcasting Corporation and Others v Chau Chak Wing [2019] FCAFC 125; 271 FCR 632 Bodney v Bennell [2008] FCAFC 63; 167 FCR 84 Cherokee Nation v Georgia 30 US 1 Chetcuti v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 42; 95 ALJR 1 Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs [1992] HCA 64; 176 CLR 1 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Kojic [2016] FCAFC 186; 249 FCR 421 Commonwealth v Tasmania [1983] HCA 21; 158 CLR 1 Commonwealth v Yarmirr [2001] HCA 56; 208 CLR 1 Cunliffe v Commonwealth [1994] HCA 44; 182 CLR 272 De Rose v State of South Australia [2003] FCAFC 286; 133 FCR 325 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Thomas [2016] VSCA 237; 315 FLR 31 Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103; 197 FCR 261 Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; In re Yates [1925] HCA 53; 37 CLR 36 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Gayle [2019] NSWCA 172; 100 NSWLR 155 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; 230 CLR 89 Gibbs v Capewell [1995] FCA 25; 54 FCR 503 Hackett (a pseudonym) v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2020] NSWCA 83; 379 ALR 248 Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 266; 87 NSWLR 609 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1872 Hepples v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [1992] HCA 3; 173 CLR 492 Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Australian Branch trading as Liberty Specialty Markets [2020] FCA 1493 King-Ansell v Police [1979] 2 NZLR 531 Long v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1422 Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3; 375 ALR 597 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1 McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 416 McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 223 Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58; 214 CLR 422 Ngarluma Aboriginal Corporation v Ramirez [2018] FCA 1900; 364 ALR 94 Obeid v Lockley [2018] NSWCA 71; 98 NSWLR 258 Perara-Cathcart v The Queen [2017] HCA 9; 260 CLR 595 Pochi v MacPhee [1982] HCA 60; 151 CLR 101 Re Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Minister for; Ex parte Te [2002] HCA 48; 212 CLR 162 Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor [2001] HCA 51; 207 CLR 391 Re Woolley; Ex parte Applicants M276/2003 [2004] HCA 49; 225 CLR 1 Risk (on behalf of the Larrakia People) v Northern Territory and Others (No NTD 5 of 2006) [2007] FCAFC 46; 240 ALR 75 Risk v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 404 Sampi v Western Australia [2010] FCAFC 26; 266 ALR 537 Sandy v Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation (No 4) [2018] WASC 124; 126 ACSR 370 Shaw v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 72; 218 CLR 28 Shaw v Wolf [1998] FCA 389; 83 FCR 113 Tasmania v Victoria [1935] HCA 4; 52 CLR 157 Wagonga Local Aboriginal Land Council v Attorney General of New South Wales [2020] FCA 1113 Webster v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 702; 277 FCR 38 |
|
|
|
|
Division: |
General Division |
|
|
|
|
Registry: |
Tasmania |
|
|
|
|
National Practice Area: |
Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights |
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs: |
347 |
|
|
|
|
Date of last submissions: |
3 February 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Date of hearing: |
11-12 February 2021 |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Applicant: |
Mr S J Keim SC with Ms C J Klease |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Applicant: |
Sentry Law |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent: |
Mr S Lloyd SC with Mr C Tran |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Respondent: |
Australian Government Solicitor |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Intervener: |
Ms R Webb QC with Dr R Cunningham and Mr T Goodwin |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Intervener: |
King & Wood Mallesons |
ORDERS
|
|
TAD 19 of 2020 |
|
|
|
||
|
BETWEEN: |
KENRICK HENARE HELMBRIGHT Applicant
|
|
|
AND: |
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS Respondent
|
|
|
|
MELYTHINA TIAKANA WARRANA (HEART OF COUNTRY) ABORIGINAL CORPORATION Intervener
|
|
|
order made by: |
MORTIMER J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
15 JUNE 2021 |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed.
2. On or before 4 pm on 29 June 2021 the parties file agreed orders in relation to costs.
3. In the absence of any agreement pursuant to order 2, on or before 4 pm on 6 July 2021 each party have leave to file any written submissions as to costs, limited to three pages.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MORTIMER J:
INTRODUCTION1 This proceeding raises important questions arising out of the High Court’s decision in Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3; 375 ALR 597 (Love/Thoms) and the majority finding (at [81]) that
Aboriginal Australians (understood according to the tripartite test in Mabo (No 2)) are not within the reach of the “aliens” power conferred by s 51(xix) of the Constitution.
2 The applicant, Kenrick Henare Helmbright, seeks a declaration that he is not an alien for the purposes of s 51(xix) of the Constitution. He is a non-citizen. He...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 3)
...(No 2) [2015] HCA 53; 90 ALJR 270 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 647 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1872 Johnston v Cameron [2002] FCA......
-
Hobson v Commonwealth of Australia
...Guo v Commonwealth [2017] FCA 1355 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 647 Jerrard (Deceased), Re Estate [2018] NSWSC 781; 97 NSWLR 1106 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; 101 CLR 298 Lacey (a pseudonym) v Attorney Gener......
-
Hirama v Minister for Home Affairs
...v Tasmania [1983] HCA 21; 158 CLR 1 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 647 Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3; 375 ALR 597 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1 Manado (on behalf of......
-
Dhu v Karlka Nyiyaparli Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC (No 2)
...[2019] FCAFC 177; 273 FCR 350 Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2021] FCA 647 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Australian Branch trading as Liberty Speciality Markets v Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 126 Mabo v Queensl......