Henry v Henry
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1995] HCA 64,[1996] HCA 51,1996-0417 HCA C |
| Year | 1995 |
| Date | 1995 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
113 cases
-
Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault Sa v Zhang
...of injustice, they inform it in the same way. Thus, it is appropriate to note what was said by Dawson, Gaudron, McHugh and Gummow JJ in Henry v Henry21. Their Honours said 22: ‘In [ Voth] 23, this Court confirmed its rejection, in [ Oceanic Sun] 24, of the forum non conveniens principle as ......
- Hi-Fert Pty Ltd v Kiukiang Maritime Carriers Inc.
- Armacel Pty Ltd v Smurfit Stone Container Corporation
- Suzlon Energy Ltd v Bangad
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...Pty Ltd v Capital Scafolding Pty Ltd (No.1) [2017] VSC 606. 51 Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 538; Henry v Henry (1995) 185 CLR 571 at 587, per Dawson, Gaudron, McHugh and Gummow JJ. 52 See, eg, Clough Engineering Ltd v Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCA......
-
The HCCH Judgments Convention in Australian Law
...Press, 2008) 355 [9.28] n 57.128. See parallel in Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention arts 9(f)–(g).129. Henry v Henry (1996) 185 CLR 571, 590; Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 538.130. Similar to FJA (n 18) s 7(2)(b).131. Judgments Convention (n 5) art 7(21)(f).13......