Hi-Fert Pty Ltd v Kuikiang Maritime Carriers Inc. (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Judgment Date1997
Year1997
Date1997

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Bidois & ORS v Leef & ORS Ca 441/2013
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 18 May 2015
    ...include relationships between persons in breach of statutory duty and their victims: Hi-Fert Pty Ltd v Kiukiang Maritime Carriers Inc (1997) 145 ALR 500 (arbitration clause upheld where dispute under Trade Practices Act 1974 (Aust), the Australian equivalent of the Fair Trading Act 1986 (Ne......
  • Methanex Motunui Ltd & Methanex Waitara Valley Ltd v Joseph Spellman and
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 17 June 2004
    ...in that view by the decision of Tamberlin J of the Federal Court of Australia in Hi-Fert Pty Ltd v Kiukiang Marine Carriers Inc (1997) 145 ALR 500. In that case Tamberlin J was asked to interpret a provision in Australian Commonwealth legislation which was in virtually identical terms to th......
2 books & journal articles
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...v Law Institute of Victoria [1998] 4 VR 324; Lloyd v Snooks (1997) 7 Tas R 18; Hi–Fert Pty Ltd v Kuikiang Maritime Carriers Inc (No 2) (1997) 75 FCR 583; Bruce v Cole (1998) 45 NSWLR 163; Bachrach (1998) 195 CLR 547. But see also Comptroller–General of Customs v Kingswood Distillery Pty Ltd......
  • Contract and the family: whither intention?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...Unity Insurance Brokers Pty Ltd v Rocco Pezzano Pty Ltd (1998) 192 CLR 603,623 (Gummow J); Hi-Fert Pty Ltd v Kuikiang Maritime Carriers (1997) 75 FCR 583, 589. See also Atiyah, above n 27, 320. In extremely unusual circumstances, the court is obliged to give effect to the parties' contractu......