Hicks v Ruddock
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 2007 |
| Neutral Citation | 2007-0308 FCA D |
| Date | 2007 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
- Preston (formerly Moore) v President of the Methodist Conference
-
C3 v The Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Affairs
... ... was arguable that habeas corpus would lie in such circumstances in respect of an Australian citizen held by the United States in Guantanamo: Hicks v Ruddock [2007] FCA 299 ; (2007) 239 ALR 344 .” ... 50 Lord Phillips is in that passage contemplating ... ...
-
Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
...arguable that habeas corpus would lie in such circumstances in respect of an Australian citizen held by the United States in Guantanamo: Hicks v Ruddock [2007] FCA 299; (2007) 239 ALR 344. 106 Does it make a difference that the United Kingdom, having lawfully detained Mr Rahmatullah in the ......
-
Habib v Australia [Australia, Federal Court]
...of the Executive's dealings with the US in respect of the detention of an Australian citizen in Guantnamo Bay in Hicks v. RuddockUNK(2007) 156 FCR 574; 239 ALR 344; [2007] FCA 299. It was referred to by Gummow J in DitfortUNK at FCR 371; ALR 2878.73. The Commonwealth submitted that the doct......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
National litigation and international law: repercussions for Australia's protection of marine resources.
...eliminate all transnational cases. (16) See, eg, Thomas v Mowbray (2007) 233 CLR 307, 354-5 (Gummow and Crennan JJ). Cf Hicks v Ruddock (2007) 156 FCR 574, 600 (Tamberlin (17) See Benvenisti, above n 11, 252-67, who notes this phenomenon of inter-judicial cooperation for reclaiming democrac......
-
Reconceptualising ‘Justiciability’: Crafting a Coherent Framework for Australia’s Unique Constitutional Context
...For judicial support of Re Ditfort, see Habib v Commonwealth (No 2) (2009) 175 FCR 350 (‘Habib (No 2)’); Thorpe (n6); Hicks v Ruddock (2007) 156 FCR 574 (‘Hicks’); Stewart v Ronalds (2009) 76 NSWLR 99, 112 [42]–[43] (Allsop P);Davis (n 16) [29] (Kenny J), [173] (Mortimer J); Habib v Commonw......
-
Reconceptualising ‘Justiciability’: Crafting a Coherent Framework for Australia’s Unique Constitutional Context
...For judicial support of Re Ditfort, see Habib v Commonwealth (No 2) (2009) 175 FCR 350 (‘Habib (No 2)’); Thorpe (n6); Hicks v Ruddock (2007) 156 FCR 574 (‘Hicks’); Stewart v Ronalds (2009) 76 NSWLR 99, 112 [42]–[43] (Allsop P);Davis (n 16) [29] (Kenny J), [173] (Mortimer J); Habib v Commonw......
-
David Hicks, Stern Hu, Scott Rush, Jock Palfreeman and the legal parameters of Australia's protection of its citizens abroad.
...Guantanamo Bay Britons', BBC News (online), 27 January 2005 . (25) Sales, above n 21, 54. (26) Ibid 101. (27) Hicks v Ruddock (2007) 156 FCR 574. (28) 'Timeline: Guantanamo Bay Britons', above n (29) According to Klein and Barry, above n 9, 5, Hicks could claim a right to British citizenshi......