Hicks v Ruddock
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Judgment Date | 08 March 2007 |
Neutral Citation | [2007] FCA 299 |
Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
C3 v The Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Affairs
...corpus would lie in such circumstances in respect of an Australian citizen held by the United States in Guantanamo: Hicks v Ruddock [2007] FCA 299; (2007) 239 ALR 344.” 50 Lord Phillips is in that passage contemplating precisely the circumstances of the present case – that is, that the UK G......
-
Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
...lie in such circumstances in respect of an Australian citizen held by the United States in Guantanamo: Hicks v Ruddock [2007] FCA 299; (2007) 239 ALR 344. 106 Does it make a difference that the United Kingdom, having lawfully detained Mr Rahmatullah in the field of battle, handed him over t......
-
McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
...[2017] FCA 1355; 258 FCR 31 Hardess v Beaumont [1953] VLR 315 Hazeldell Ltd v Commonwealth [1924] HCA 36; 34 CLR 442 Hicks v Ruddock [2007] FCA 299; 156 FCR 574 Hill v Woollahra Municipal Council [2003] NSWCA 106; 127 LGERA 7 Housden v Boral Australian Gypsum Ltd [2015] VSCA 162 Hung v Warn......
-
Habib v Australia [Australia, Federal Court]
...dealings with the US in respect of the detention of an Australian citizen in Guantnamo Bay in Hicks v. RuddockUNK(2007) 156 FCR 574; 239 ALR 344; [2007] FCA 299. It was referred to by Gummow J in DitfortUNK at FCR 371; ALR 2878.73. The Commonwealth submitted that the doctrine is informed by......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
DOES LIM TRULY HAVE 'NOTHING TO SAY' ABOUT THE COMMONWEALTH'S REGIONAL PROCESSING ARRANGEMENTS? HABEAS CORPUS AS A VEHICLE FOR TESTING THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF OFFSHORE DETENTION.
...of Birkenhead), 620 (Viscount Finlay), 646 (Lord Shaw); Ex parte Mwenya [1960] 1 QB 241, 311 (Sellers LJ) ('Mwenya'); Hicks v Ruddock (2007) 156 FCR 574, 576 [1], 600 [92]-[94] (Tamberlin J) ('Hicks'); Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Defence [2012] 1 WLR 1462, 1472 [20]-[21] (Laws LJ) ......
-
The ‘Fatal Conundrum’ of ‘No-Consideration’ Clauses after Plaintiff M61
...Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (Judgment) [1970] ICJ Rep 3, 44 [78]–[79]. 151 Ibid 44 [78]. 152 (2007) 156 FCR 574, 593 [62]. 153 See Tran, above n 144, 314–19. 2011 The 'Fatal Conundrum' of No-Consideration Clauses 325 _______________________________......
-
David Hicks and Australian Proceeds of Crime Legislation: Can He Sell His Story?
...LLB(Hons) (Syd); BCL(Dist) (Oxon). In 2007, Lucas was Associate to the Hon Justice Tamberlin when his Honour decided Hicks v Ruddock (2007) 156 FCR 574. All opinions and errors are exclusively those of the author. 1 The background to Mr Hicks' detention has been recounted before. A fuller a......
-
The rights and responsibilities of Australian citizenship: a legislative analysis.
...(185) Ibid [6.4], (186) Ibid [6.12], (187) Ibid [6.13]. (188) Ibid [6.15], (189) Ibid [6.22]-[6.24]. (190) Ibid Introduction. (191) (2007) 156 FCR 574 (192) Ibid 594 [66] (Tamberlin J). (193) The plaintiff in Hicks drew on UK common law cases to argue for the existence of a protective duty ......
Request a trial to view additional results