Higgins v Commonwealth

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Neutral Citation1998-0203 FCA A
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Gerner v Victoria
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 December 2020
    ......, to assert that a freedom of movement is implicit in the Constitution is to assert that the Constitution impliedly denies to the Commonwealth and the States power to make laws the object of which is to restrict freedom of movement. . . 11 The plaintiffs argued that the ...That suggestion was rejected when made in Higgins v The Commonwealth 12 . In that case, Finn J rejected a challenge to the validity of a law 13 that suspended the payment of unemployment benefits ......
  • Williams v Child Support Registrar
    • Australia
    • Federal Magistrates Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT