Hml v R; Sb v R; Oae v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[2008] HCA 16,2008-0424 HCA B
Date2008
Year2008
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
148 cases
  • DPP v McNeill
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 8 April 2011
    ...DEFENDANT 1996 PARA 2.70 LAW CMSN REPORT NO 273 EVIDENCE OF BAD CHARACTER IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS 2001 PARA 10.1 L (HM) & ORS v R 2007-08 235 CLR 334 245 ALR 204 2008 HCA 16 AG v JOYCE & WALSH 1929 IR 526 AG, PEOPLE v KIRWAN 1943 IR 279 R v BUTLER 1999 CRIM LR 835 DPP v G (L) 2003 2 IR 51......
  • The Queen v Getachew
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 28 March 2012
    ...234 at 248–249 [44], 256–257 [75]–[77]; [2006] HCA 56; Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559 at 590 [86]; [2007] HCA 30; HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334 at 386 –387 [121]; [2008] HCA 16; R v Keenan (2009) 236 CLR 397 at 425 [91], 436–437 [133]; [2009] HCA 1; Pollock v The Queen (2010) 242......
  • Stubley v Western Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 30 March 2011
    ...308 [9] per Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne and Heydon JJ; [2006] HCA 4; HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334 at 431 fn 309 per Heydon J; [2008] HCA 16. 5 (2008) 36 WAR 413 at 429 [61]. Section 31A of the Evidence Act has also been considered by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of W......
  • BD(Appellant) v The Queen
    • Australia
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 13 April 2017
    ...NSWCCA 317, GBF v The Queen [2010] VSCA 135, Harkin v R (1989) 38 A Crim R 296, Hoch v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 292, HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334, IMM v The Queen (2016) 90 ALJR 529, Jacara Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (2000) 180 ALR 569, King v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 423, Pe......
  • Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
  • Whither, hither and thither, Res Gestae? A comparative analysis of its relevance and application
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 25-4, October 2021
    • 1 October 2021
    ...that make it unlikely that the representation is a fabrication’;seealso Williams vThe Queen [2000] FCA 1868 at [46].64. HML vThe Queen [2008] HCA 16 at [496].65. Conway vThe Queen [2000] FCA 461 at [133].338 The International Journal of Evidence & Proof (a) In the High Court of Australia, t......
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • 1 November 2008
    .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .290HKSAR vLee Chi Fai[2003] 3 HKC486 . . . . . . . 291HML vR, SB vR, OAE vR [2008] HCA16 . . . . . . 350Hollingham vHead (1858) 4CB (NS) 388 . . . .279Hollington v F. Hewthorn & Co. Ltd [1943]KB 587. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 13-4, November 2009
    • 1 November 2009
    ...v Thapa Magdalenae (HCMA 1131/1999,7September 2000,unreported) . . 218,222, 224HL v Canada (Attorney-General) 2005 SCC 25 . 69HML vR [2008] HCA16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65Hobbs vTinling [1929] 2KB 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37Horncastle vR [2009] EWCACrim 964 . . 324......
  • The behaviour of serial child sex offenders: implications for the prosecution of child sex offences in joint trials.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 35 No. 3, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...(Mason CJ, Deane and Dawson JJ), 506 (Yoohey J). Its ongoing applicability as an exclusionary rule was confirmed in HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334. (159) See above n (160) [1991] 2 AC 447, 463. (161) See, eg, the facts in R v Best [1998] 4 VR 603 and R v Papamitrou (2004) 7 VR 375. (162......
  • Get Started for Free