Hodak v Newman

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFamily Court (Australia)
Date1993
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Re G (Children) (Residence: Same-sex Partner)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 26 July 2006
    ...is irrelevant. The position in English law is akin to that in Australian law, as explained by Lindenmayer J in Hodak, Newman and Hodak (1993) FLC 92-421, and subsequently approved by the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in Rice v Miller (1993) FLC 92-415 and Re Evelyn [1998] F......
  • Re D (A Child)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 March 2014
    ......The position in English law is akin to that in Australian law, as explained by Lindenburgh J in Hodak, Newman and Hodak (1993) FLC 92–421 , and subsequently approved by the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in Rice v Miller (1993) FLC ......
  • Re A (A Child)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 July 2008
    ...... . . 75 At paragraph [31] she referred with approval to Australian authority in Hodak, Newman and Hodak (1993) FLC 92– 421 per Lindenmayer J that: “I am of the opinion that the fact of parenthood is to be regarded as ......
  • Mg and Mj
    • Australia
    • Federal Magistrates Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT