Hodak v Newman
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Date | 1993 |
| Court | Family Court (Australia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Re D (A Child)
... ... The position in English law is akin to that in Australian law, as explained by Lindenburgh J in Hodak, Newman and Hodak (1993) FLC 92–421 , and subsequently approved by the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in Rice v Miller (1993) FLC ... ...
-
Re G (Children) (Residence: Same-sex Partner)
...is irrelevant. The position in English law is akin to that in Australian law, as explained by Lindenmayer J in Hodak, Newman and Hodak (1993) FLC 92-421, and subsequently approved by the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in Rice v Miller (1993) FLC 92-415 and Re Evelyn [1998] F......
-
Re A (A Child)
... ... 75 At paragraph [31] she referred with approval to Australian authority in Hodak, Newman and Hodak (1993) FLC 92– 421 per Lindenmayer J that: “I am of the opinion that the fact of parenthood is to be regarded as ... ...
-
G., Re, (2006) 362 N.R. 16 (HL)
...refd to. [para. 28]. W. (A Minor) (Residence Order), Re, [1993] 2 F.L.R. 625 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 29]. Hodak, Newman and Hodak, Re (1993), F.L.C. 92-421, refd to. [para. Rice v. Miller (1993), F.L.C. 92-415, refd to. [para. 31]. Evelyn, Re, [1998] Fam. C.A. 55, refd to. [para. 31]. M.A.C......
Request a trial to view additional results