Honeysett v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Judge | French CJ,Kiefel,Gageler,Keane JJ |
| Judgment Date | 13 August 2014 |
| Neutral Citation | [2014] HCA 29 |
| Docket Number | S57/2014 |
| Date | 13 August 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
40 cases
-
Stuart v Rabobank Australia Ltd
...v St George Bank a Division of Westpac Banking Corporation; Haynes v Westpac Banking Corporation [2018] SASCFC 51 Honeysett v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 122; [2014] HCA 29 Hornal v Neuberger Products Ltd [1957] 1 QB 247; [1956] 3 All ER 970 Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338; [2017] HCA 20......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
-
Body of Knowledge: Expert evidence and the limits of specialised knowledge
...v The Queen [2014] HCA 29 '[The] evidence gave the unwarranted appearance of science to the prosecution case that the appellant and Offender One share a number of physical characteristics ... "Offender One and the appellant are both ectomorphic" - was apt to suggest the existence of more te......
-
Expert evidence in New South Wales
...judicial officers since the commencement of this provision and the issue of its definition has been resolved in Honeysett v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 122 at "Specialised knowledge is knowledge which is outside that of persons who have not by training, study or experience acquired an understa......
-
Expert evidence in New South Wales
...judicial officers since the commencement of this provision and the issue of its definition has been resolved in Honeysett v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 122 at "Specialised knowledge is knowledge which is outside that of persons who have not by training, study or experience acquired an understa......
-
Opinion evidence in New South Wales
...to an asserted fact: Allstate Life Insurance Co v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (No 5) (1996) 64 FCR 73, at [75] and Honeysett v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 122. Evidence of an experience or description of evidence is not evidence of an opinion: R v Drolley [2005] NSWCCA 356, at [54-55]. The evidence ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence
...also R v Weighman [2011] EWCA Crim 2826. 35. Contrast the Australian response in Morgan v R [2011] NSWCCA 257 and Honeysett v The Queen [2014] HCA 29.36. Whether podiatrists perform this task significantly better than ordinary persons is an empirical question that ought to answered. See Cun......
-
Mental Health Expertise in Refugee Status Decision-Making: Judging or Caring?
...ontraining, study or experience is a matter that goes to the admissibility of the evidence, not itsweight’. See also Honeysett vThe Queen [2014] HCA 29.36 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s. 430 (RRT) and (for Departmental delegates) see s. 66. See, e.g., thediscussion of s. 430 in Algama vMiniste......
-
FACIAL RECOGNITION AND IMAGE COMPARISON EVIDENCE: IDENTIFICATION BY INVESTIGATORS, FAMILIARS, EXPERTS, SUPER-RECOGNISERS AND ALGORITHMS.
...to the fingerprint records on file, which are used to identify latent prints from a crime scene. (8) See Honeysett v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 122, 138 [45]-[46] (French CJ, Kiefel, Bell, Gageler and Keane JJ) ('Honeysett'). See also Kemp, Edmond and White (n 3) (9) See, eg, R v Tang(2006) 6......
-
FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE AND THE LIMITS OF CROSS-EXAMINATION.
...A Crim R 329; Morgan v R (2011) 215 A Crim R 33; R v Dastagir (2013) 118 SASR 83; Honeysett v The Queen (2013) 233 A Crim R 152, revd (2014) 253 CLR 122 (Honeysett (High (11) NRC Report (n 8) 7; see also at 7-8. For an introduction and overview, see Gary Edmond, 'What Lawyers Should Know ab......
Request a trial to view additional results