Horman v Distribution Group Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Year2001
Date2001
CourtFederal Magistrates Court (Australia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • So Far So Good?: A Critical Evaluation of Racial Vilification Laws in Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-2, June 2004
    • 1 June 2004
    ...58 ('Combined Housing'); Feghaly [2000] EOC ¶93–090; McMahon v Bowman [2000] FMCA 3 (Raphael FM) ('McMahon'); Horman v Distribution Group [2001] FMCA 52 (Raphael FM) ('Horman'). 63 This may explain the determinations in Rugema and McMahon where the relevant statements involved were respecti......
  • So Far So Good?: A Critical Evaluation of Racial Vilification Laws in Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-2, June 2004
    • 1 June 2004
    ...58 ('Combined Housing'); Feghaly [2000] EOC ¶93–090; McMahon v Bowman [2000] FMCA 3 (Raphael FM) ('McMahon'); Horman v Distribution Group [2001] FMCA 52 (Raphael FM) ('Horman'). 63 This may explain the determinations in Rugema and McMahon where the relevant statements involved were respecti......
  • CHAPTER 28
    • United States
    • Full Court Press The Global #MeToo Movement
    • Invalid date
    ...Djokic v. Sinclair (1994) EOC 92-643 (Australia); Shiels v. James [2000] FMCA 2 (Australia).[7] Horman v. Distribution Group Ltd [2001] FMCA 52 (Australia); Daley v. Barrington [2003] FMCA 93 (Australia). [8] Australian Human Rights Commission, Everyone's Business: Fourth National Survey on......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT