Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gaudron,Gummow,Hayne JJ,McHugh J,Kirby J,Callinan J
Judgment Date14 November 2002
Neutral Citation[2002] HCA 51,2002-1114 HCA B
Docket NumberP58/2001
CourtHigh Court
Date14 November 2002
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
67 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Two wrongs do not always make a writ: scope of remedies on judicial review
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 25 February 2015
    ...government of which the Minister is a member, and thus, affect the Minister's continuance in office" (see Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy [2002] HCA 51; (2002) 210 CLR However, accepting the breadth of considerations that may fall within an assessment of the national interest in any given cas......
6 books & journal articles
  • Of Kings and Officers — The Judicial Development of Public Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 33-2, June 2005
    • 1 June 2005
    ...above n 275, 14; Peter Hall, Investigating Corruption and Misconduct in Public Office (2004) 7–13. 278 In Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (2002) 210 CLR 438, 481 Kirby J refers to the purported trust relationship as a 'metaphor'. 279 It should not be forgotten, of course, that there are many ......
  • Apprehended Bias in Australian Administrative Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 38-3, September 2010
    • 1 September 2010
    ...Country Planning [1948] AC 87, 104 ('Franklin'); CREEDNZ In c v Governor-General [1981] 1 NZLR 172, 179 ('CREEDNZ Inc'); Hot Holdings (2002) 210 CLR 438, 455 [50]. 40 (1989) 100 ALR 383, 417 and to similar effect see Laws (1990) 170 CLR 70, 91. 41 See, eg, Hot Holdings (2002) 210 CLR 438, 4......
  • The Evolution and Reform of Standing in Australian Administrative Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 44-2, June 2016
    • 1 June 2016
    ...law remedies occurred in times when the limits of ministerial responsibility became apparent: Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (2002) 210 CLR 438, 467 [93]. 2016 The Evolution and Reform of Standing in Australian Administrative Law 171 __________________________________________________________......
  • Public Trusts, Public Fiduciaries
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 38-3, September 2010
    • 1 September 2010
    ...Wade and Christopher Forsyth, Administrative Law (9th ed, 2004) 354–5 (emphasis added). 36 See also Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (2002) 210 CLR 438, [135] where the purpose of the metaphor is openly acknowledged. 37 The convergence of the principles applied in different areas of law, eg st......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT