Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy

Cited in 102 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1996-0227 HCA A
Date1996
Year1996
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
80 cases
  • Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 November 2010
    ...691 at 699; Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 at 580–581, 595; [1992] HCA 10; Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (1996) 185 CLR 149 at 159–165, 178–180; [1996] HCA 44; R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board; Ex parte Lain 1967 2 QB 864 at 48Forster v Jododex Aust Pty L......
  • Randwick City Council v Minister for The Environment
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 February 2018
    ...HCA 10; Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480 at 492 [25]; [2013] HCA 43 citing Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (1996) 185 CLR 149 at 159; [1996] HCA 29Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239 CLR 531 at 580–581 [98]; [2010] HCA 1. 30 (2010) 239 CLR 531 at 580–581 [98......
  • Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 February 2018
    ...HCA 10; Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480 at 492 [25]; [2013] HCA 43 citing Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (1996) 185 CLR 149 at 159; [1996] HCA 29Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239 CLR 531 at 580–581 [98]; [2010] HCA 1. 30 (2010) 239 CLR 531 at 580–581 [98......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Griffith University V Tang, ‘Under an Enactment’ and Limiting Access to Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 33-3, September 2005
    • 1 September 2005
    ...134 [1967] 2 QB 864 ('Lain'). 135 Ibid 888. The judgment of Brennan CJ, Gaudron and Gummow JJ in Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (1996) 185 CLR 149 quoted this passage from Lord Diplock with apparent approval in discussing the availability of the prerogative writs to decisions not involving '......
  • The Constitution’s Guarantee of Legal Accountability for Jurisdictions
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 49-4, December 2021
    • 1 December 2021
    ...the way the term has been developed and applied to conferredstatutory powers in judicial review.10 Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (1996) 185 CLR 149, 159 (Brennan CJ, Gaudron and Gummow JJ). See also Ainsworth vCriminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 (‘Ainsworth’), 580-1 (Mason CJ, Da......
  • Why These Three? the Significance of the Selection of Remedies in Section 75(V) of the Australian Constitution
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...non-judicial decision makers at common law (Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564; Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (1996) 185 CLR 149; Grocon Constructors Pty Ltd v Planit Cocciardi Joint Venture (No 2) (2009) 26 VR 172). 118 See further section V(B) below. 119 Official R......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT