House v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1936-0817 HCA A,[1936] HCA 40 |
| Year | 1936 |
| Date | 1936 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3239 cases
5 firm's commentaries
-
NSW Government Bulletin - Part 2: In the media, Practice and courts, Cases, Legislation
...APPEALS - Leave to appeal - Principles governing - Public importance. APPEALS - From exercise of discretion - Whether House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 type error disclosed by the primary Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 4(1)(d), 41, 80(2)(a), 83(1); Civi......
-
The art of assessing future quantum in personal injury cases - an appellate review
...low or so inordinately high as to be wholly erroneous estimate of the damages suffered." This is referred to in House v King (1936) 55 CLR 499 as "the deferential standard applicable to appellate review of an exercise of judicial Macfarlan JA, however, argued that given that the award of ge......
-
Fair Work Commission - When will the Full Bench entertain an unfair dismissal appeal?
...discretionary nature of the decision the subject of the appeal, also directed the Full Bench's attention to the principles in House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 which it reproduced as "It is not enough that the judges composing the appellate court consider that, if they had been in the position of......
-
Fair Work Commission - When will the Full Bench entertain an appeal?
...discretionary nature of the decision the subject of the appeal, also directed the Full Bench's attention to the principles in House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 which it reproduced as "It is not enough that the judges composing the appellate court consider that, if they had been in the position of......
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
The 2017 Winterton Lecture. Sir Owen Dixon Today
...of Taxation (2015) 255 CLR 439, [20]-[22], [140]-[144]; [2015] HCA 25. 100 (1938) 61 CLR 337, 363; [1938] HCA 73. 101 (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40. 102 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499, 505; [1936] HCA 40. 103 (1937) 59 CLR 641, 675-7; [1937] HCA 53, further discussed by Sir Owen Dixo......
-
Litigation
...per Spigelman CJ and Allsop P. he reference system in the Australian courts was discussed earlier in this chapter. 1350 House v he King (1936) 55 CLR 499 at 504–505; he Council of the City of Sydney v Woodward [2000] NSWCA 201 at [94], per Heydon JA [17 BCL 42]. 1351 See, eg, Allmen Industr......
-
The Nature of Merits Review: A Bold Vision Realised in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
...of the ACCC is conditioned upon its first _____________________________________________________________________________________ 165 (1936) 55 CLR 499, 505. 166 East Australian Pipeline Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2007) 233 CLR 229, 250 [79]. 167 Ibid 25 0 [80].......
-
Time Limitations on Applications for Judicial Review
...v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 42 FCR 578 (Gummow, Hill and Cooper JJ). 78 The principles are enunciated in House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; Gronow v Gronow (1979) 144 CLR 513, 519–20 (Stephen J); Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Phillip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170, 177 ......
Get Started for Free