Howarth v Mcmahon
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | [1951] HCA 19,1951-0427 HCA D |
Year | 1951 |
Date | 1951 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
- Baiada v Baulkham Hills Shire Council
-
Daera Guba on behalf of himself and the Tubumaga Clan of Poreporena v The Administration of the Territory of Papua and New Guinea; Lohia Doriga on behalf of himself and the Giakone Clan v The Administration of the Territory of Papua and New Guinea and Daera Guba on behalf of himself and the Tubumaga Clan of Poreprena (In Re Era Taora Land)
...not found it necessary to consider the correctness of that decision, I consider that this Court should follow it. Howarth & McMahon 82 CLR 442 at 449–450, Baiada v Baulkham Hills Shire Council 83 CLR 344 at 350–1. The cases cited are all cases of the compulsory acquisition of land in which ......
- Minister for Public Works v Duggan
-
Tolain, Topalau, Tomaret, Michael Towarunga and Other Villagers of Latlat Village v The Administration of the Territory of Papua and New Guinea (In Re Vulcan Land) [1965–66] PNGLR 232
...(1963) 109 CLR 475, distinguished. Baiada v Baulkham Hills Shire Council and Another (1951) 83 CLR 344; and Howarth v McMahon (1951) 82 CLR 442, considered.) (5) The concept of land ownership in the Territory is different from the English concept and the word "owner" must be interpreted in ......
Request a trial to view additional results