Hoyle v The Queen
Jurisdiction | Australian Capital Territory |
Judge | Murrell CJ,Burns,North JJ |
Judgment Date | 20 September 2018 |
Court | Court of Appeal of ACT |
Docket Number | File Number: ACTCA 18 of 2017 |
Date | 20 September 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Ford v Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3)
...(No 2) (2003) 130 FCR 424; [2003] FCA 893 Hassell v Adelaide Magistrates Court [2008] SASC 132 Hoyle v The Queen (2018) 339 FCR 11; [2018] ACTCA 42 Hughes trading as Beesley and Hughes Lawyers v Hill (2020 382 ALR 231; [2020] FCAFC 126 Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338; [2017] HCA 20 IM......
-
UQ v The Queen
...Queen [2008] NSWCCA 306 Doe v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 203; 187 A Crim R 328 Greenhalgh v The Queen [2017] NSWCCA 94 Hoyle v The Queen [2018] ACTCA 42; 339 FLR 11 MAJW v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 255 Munro v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 11 Palmer v The Queen [1998] HCA 2; 193 CLR 1 Popovic v The Que......
-
Hoyle v Director-General Corrective Services
...Parole Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 526 Galli v New South Wales State Parole Authority [2006] NSWSC 206 Hoyle v The Queen [2018] ACTCA 42; 339 FLR 11 Kocic v Commission of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCA 368; 88 NSWLR 159 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh......
-
R v Featherstone; R v Bloxsome
...(Crown) Mr J Lawton (First Defendant) Mr J Stewart (Second Defendant) Cases Cited: R v Demirok [1976] VR 244 Hoyle v The Queen [2018] ACTCA 42 CRIMINAL LAW — Pre-trial application — co-accused — application for separate trials — opposed by the Crown — sexual assault matters relating only to......