Hub Street Equipment Pty Ltd v Energy City Qatar Holding Company
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Judgment Date | 25 June 2021 |
Neutral Citation | [2021] FCAFC 110 |
Date | 25 June 2021 |
Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
EBJ21 v EBO21
...CLR 10 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission [2010] HCA 21; 240 CLR 651 Hub Street Equipment Pty Ltd v Energy City Qatar Holding Company [2021] FCAFC 110; 153 ACSR 84 InfraRed Environmental Infrastructure GP Ltd v Spain, No ARB/14/12, Decision on the Continuation of the Stay of Enforcement of......
-
Guoao Holding Group Co Ltd v Xue (No 2)
...Import & Export Corp v Polytek Engineering Co Ltd [1999] 2 HKC 205 Hub Street Equipment Pty Ltd v Energy City Qatar Holding Company [2021] FCAFC 110; 290 FCR 298 IMC Aviation Solutions Pty Ltd v Altain Khuder LLC [2011] VSCA 248; 38 VR 303 Minmetals Germany GmbH v Ferco Steel Ltd [1999] 1 A......
-
Hub Street Equipment Pty Ltd v Energy City Qatar Holding Company (No 2)
...Catchwords: COSTS – consent orders – appropriate form of order Cases: Hub Street Equipment Pty Ltd v Energy City Qatar Holding Company [2021] FCAFC 110 Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations of the solicitors for the appellan......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Hub Street appeal ' What does it mean for arbitration in Australia?
...in Qatar. But just how 'pro' arbitration are we? The Full Court of the Federal Court has now reversed the decision at first instance ([2021] FCAFC 110) and declined to make orders for the enforcement of the award in the process tempering slightly the 'pro-arbitration' stance adopted by the ......
-
Hub Street appeal ' What does it mean for arbitration in Australia?
...in Qatar. But just how 'pro' arbitration are we? The Full Court of the Federal Court has now reversed the decision at first instance ([2021] FCAFC 110) and declined to make orders for the enforcement of the award in the process tempering slightly the 'pro-arbitration' stance adopted by the ......