Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Huddart, Parker & Company Pty Ltd v Moorehead

Cited authorities 26 Cited in 220 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date1908
Neutral Citation1908-0607 HCA A,[1909] HCA 36
Date1908
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
156 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Fried Frank International Arbitration Newsletter, June 2013
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 1 July 2013
    ...decision (whether subject to appeal or not) is called upon to take" (per Griffith CJ in Huddart,Parker & Co. Pty Ltd. v. Moorehead [1909] HCA 36, (1909) 8 CLR 4 Dobbs v. National Australia Bank (1935) 53 CLR 643, 652-53. The Role of Pleadings in International Arbitration In the recent d......
42 books & journal articles
  • Arbitrate this! Enforcing foreign arbitral awards and chapter III of the Constitution.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 34 No. 2, August 2010
    • 1 August 2010
    ...Hayne and Callinan JJ). (126) Takeovers Panel (2008) 233 CLR 542, 577 (Hayne J). (127) See Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330, 357. (128) See generally, eg, Zines, The High Court and the Constitution, above n 98, 247-61; Cheryl Saunders, 'The Separation of Powers'......
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 2, August 2012
    • 1 August 2012
    ...(Mason J). See also Nicholas v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 173, 220-1 [112] (McHugh J). (256) Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330, 357 (Griffith CJ); Rola Co (Australia) Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1944) 69 CLR 185, 199 (Latham CJ); Polyukhovich v Commonwealth (1991) 172 ......
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...in which the author identified in Sir Owen Dixon's decisions certain 'federal assumptions'. 57 Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330, 357 (Griffith CJ). 58 Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245, 267 (Deane, Dawson, Gaudron and McHugh J......
  • Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 35-3, September 2007
    • 1 September 2007
    ...(Australia) Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1944) 69 CLR 185, 198–9 (Latham CJ, McTiernan J agreeing); Huddart Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330, 357 (Griffith CJ). 89 Huddart Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330, 357 (Griffith CJ); see also Australian Law Reform Commissi......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT