Hughes trading as Beesley and Hughes Lawyers v Hill
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Judgment Date | 24 July 2020 |
Neutral Citation | [2020] FCAFC 126 |
Date | 24 July 2020 |
Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Ford v Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3)
...SASC 132 Hoyle v The Queen (2018) 339 FCR 11; [2018] ACTCA 42 Hughes trading as Beesley and Hughes Lawyers v Hill (2020 382 ALR 231; [2020] FCAFC 126 Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338; [2017] HCA 20 IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 4 Australian Competition & Consumer Commi......
-
Friend v Comcare
...599 Hall v A & A Sheiban Pty Ltd (1989) 20 FCR 217 Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 Hughes (t/as Beesley and Hughes Laywers) v Hill (2020) 277 FCR 511 I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd (2002) 210 CLR 109 McLaurin v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1961) 104 CLR ......
-
Leggett v Hawkesbury Race Club Limited (No 3)
...right to make a complaint about his behaviour. As Perram J, with whom Collier and Reeves JJ agreed, asked rhetorically in Hughes v Hill (2020) 277 FCR 511 at 521 [47], in a case of sexual harassment contrary to s 28A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth), “what is the ruin of a person’s ......
-
Leggett v Hawkesbury Race Club Limited (No 3)
...Winterthur Insurance (Australia) Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 226 Gifford v Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty Ltd (2003) 214 CLR 269 Hughes v Hill (2020) 277 FCR 511 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd (2005) 222 CLR 44 Kondis v State Transport Au......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Rethinking Richardson: Sexual Harassment Damages in the #MeToo Era
...Court, further emboldens the case’s impact on the assessment of damages goingforward.131. Hill v Hughes (2019) 287 IR 86; Hughes v Hill (2020) 297 IR 323.132. Hill v Hughes (n 131) 119 [241]; Hughes v Hill (n 131) 326 [10].133. Hill v Hughes (n 131) 119 [251].134. Ibid 113 [184], 117 [221].......