IceTV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | French CJ,Gummow,Kiefel JJ,Hayne,Heydon JJ. |
| Judgment Date | 22 April 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] HCA 14,2009-0422 HCA A |
| Docket Number | S415/2008 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 22 April 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
43 cases
22 firm's commentaries
-
Can a database be protected by copyright?
...in a database? Can use of a database be protected via a contract or license? Big data as a Privacy Concern Conclus·ons Footnotes 10(2009) 239 CLR 458 11[2010] FCA 44 12(2002) 119 FCR 491 13Ibid [407] 14Supra note 16 at [188] 15Supra note 16 at [23] per French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ 16(20......
-
Isolated genetic material: invention or land grab? The D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics case
...24(4) Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin. 33Above, n 10, at [8]. 34 See IceTV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (2009) 239 CLR 458; 254 ALR 386; [2009] HCA 14; BC200902942 and also Telstra Corp Ltd v Phone Directories Co Pty Ltd (2010) 194 FCR 142; 273ALR 725; [2010] FCAFC......
-
No copyright protection for telephone companies - Telstra v Phone Directories Company
...hit 'Down Under' infringed copyright in 'Kookaburra sits in the old gumtree'. 2 IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] HCA 14. See our update on this case at 3 Desktop Marketing Systems Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2002] FCAFC 112. 4 See Feist Publications v Rur......
-
Is this headline protected by copyright? Federal Court says no as Fairfax loses copyright infringement case.
...1 November 2007, pg 1. 7 From Australian Financial Review, 1 November 2007, pg 27. IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] HCA 14 Copyright Act 1968 10 From Australian Financial Review, 27 June 2007, pg 1. 11 From Australian Financial Review, 1 November 2007, pg 1. 12 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
16 books & journal articles
-
A LOOK BACK AT PUBLIC POLICY, THE LEGISLATURE, THE COURTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COPYRIGHT LAW IN SINGAPORE
...v Creative Technology Ltd [1995] 3 SLR(R) 568 at 590. 78 Aztech Systems Pte Ltd v Creative Technology Ltd [1995] 3 SLR(R) 568 at 590. 79 [2009] HCA 14. 80 Sections 51 and 52 of the Patents Act 1994 (Act 21 of 1994); currently Cap 221, 2005 Rev Ed. 81 See generally Part XI of the Patents Act......
-
Table of cases
...[1992] A.J. No. 122, 41 C.P.R.3d 45, 47 (C.A.) (Can.) ........................ 85 I IceTV Pty. Ltd. v. Nine Network Austl. Pty. Ltd., (2009) H.C.A. 14 ................................................................................. 622 IceTV Pty. Ltd., (2009) 83 A.L.J.R. 585.....................
-
REFLECTIONS ON AUTHORSHIP AND THE MEANING OF A “WORK” IN AUSTRALIAN AND SINGAPORE COPYRIGHT LAW
...FTR 80. 26Waterlow Publishers Ltd v Rose(1989) 17 IPR 493 and Desktop Marketing Systems Pty Ltd v Telstra Corp Ltd(2002) 55 IPR 1. 27(2009) 239 CLR 458 (HC). 28 Copyright Act 1968 (Act No 63 of 1968) (Cth) (Aust) s 14(1); Copyright Act 1987 (Act 2 of 1987) s 10(1). 29 Copyright, Designs and......
-
INTERPRETING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STATUTES IN SINGAPORE
...copyright law with the position implicitly taken by the High Court of Australia. See IceTV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd[2009] HCA 14 at [98] where it was observed, albeit in passing, that “author” should be regarded as “the person who brings the copyright work into existence in ......
Request a trial to view additional results