ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Judge | French CJ,Gummow,Crennan JJ,Hayne,Kiefel,Bell JJ,Heydon J |
Judgment Date | 09 December 2009 |
Neutral Citation | [2009] HCA 51,2009-1209 HCA A |
Docket Number | S24/2009 |
Court | High Court |
Date | 09 December 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
51 cases
-
Arnold v Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000
...was effected under the same statutory scheme and pursuant to the same intergovernmental agreements as were considered in ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth1. 2 The appellants challenged the replacement of their licences on a number of grounds, including two arising under the Constit......
- Crosby v Kelly
-
JT International SA v Commonwealth of Australia
...the passage in the reasons of Deane and Gaudron JJ in Mutual Pools was understood by French CJ, Gummow and Crennan JJ in ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth203. The outcome 155 In oral submissions the Commonwealth placed at the forefront of its arguments first that no ‘property’ had ......
-
Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia
...— Whether Court could be satisfied applicant had no reasonable prospect of successfully prosecuting proceeding — Effect of ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (2009) 240 CLR 140, delivered after decisions below, on prospects of success. Statutes — Construction — Summary judgment — ‘n......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Land-Use Planning and Natural Resource Rights - The Alberta Land Stewardship Act
...to decide whether the water bore licences were intended under the creating statute to be defeasible because: 75 See note 39 above. 76 [2009] HCA 51 (‘ICM Agriculture’). 77 Ibid, para 7.Journal of Energy & Natural 490 Resources Law Vol 29 No 4 2011 ‘… whatever the proprietary character of th......
11 books & journal articles
-
Privative clauses: epic fail.
...constitutional question: see Wurridjal v Commonwealth (2009) 237 CLR 309, 437 [355] (Crennan J); ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2009) 240 CLR 140, 199 [141] (Hayne, Kiefel and Bell (43) No reference is made in Kirk to the earlier High Court decisions (see above nn 33-4 and accompan......
-
Fertile Ground for Federalism? Internal Security, the States and Section 119 of the Constitution
...(2000) 202 CLR 535, 554–5 [38] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne and Callinan JJ); ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2009) 240 CLR 140, 164–5 [29] (French CJ, Gummow and Crennan JJ); Cheryl Saunders, 'Intergovernmental Agreements and the Executive Power' (2005) 16 Public Law......
-
Between form and Substance: Minimising Judicial Scrutiny of Executive Action
...eg, Mutual Pools & Staff Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1994) 179 CLR 155, 172–173, 176, 184, 194, 222; ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2009) 240 CLR 140, 180, 196. 80 Georgiadis v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (1994) 179 CLR 297. 81 The following discussion is off......
-
‘On Just Terms’, Revisited
...(holding that s 51(xxxi) ‘has assumed the status of a constitutional guarantee of just terms’); ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2009) 240 CLR 140, 212 [185] n 301 (Heydon J) (listing recent judgments affirming the proposition that s 51(xxxi) is a constitutional guarantee) (‘ICM Agri......
Request a trial to view additional results