IMM v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | French CJ,Kiefel,Bell,Keane JJ |
| Judgment Date | 14 April 2016 |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] HCA 14 |
| Docket Number | D12/2015 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 14 April 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
142 cases
-
Stuart v Rabobank Australia Ltd
...122; [2014] HCA 29 Hornal v Neuberger Products Ltd [1957] 1 QB 247; [1956] 3 All ER 970 Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338; [2017] HCA 20 IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 Jones v Dumbrell [1981] VR 199 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Jonsson v Arkway Pty ......
-
Ford v Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3)
...s 98(1); the jury question is whether it actually does. (Footnotes omitted, emphasis in original.) In IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14, the majority 49. The same construction must be given to the words “could rationally affect [...] the assessment of the probability of the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Abuse: Childcare centre appeal decision.
...relied upon in relation to it: [178]–[179]. Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338; [2017] HCA 20; IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14, applied. As to D’s disclosures As with B’s claim, the primary judge’s reasoning was vitiated by the wrongful admission of Child 1’s evidence a......
-
Abuse: Childcare centre appeal decision.
...relied upon in relation to it: [178]–[179]. Hughes v The Queen (2017) 263 CLR 338; [2017] HCA 20; IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14, applied. As to D’s disclosures As with B’s claim, the primary judge’s reasoning was vitiated by the wrongful admission of Child 1’s evidence a......
3 books & journal articles
-
Simply Unconvincing: The High Court on Probative Value and Reliability in the Uniform Evidence Law
...to admit evidence adduced by the prosecutor if its probativevalue is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant’.5. [2016] HCA 14 (‘IMM’).6. Ibid [44], [47], [50]. This position deviates from other accusatorial trial jurisdictions, including Australian states that haveret......
-
The exclusion of prison informant evidence for unreliability in New Zealand
...is a low threshold’.72This test appears similar to the ‘incapable of bearing any significant weight’ test laid out by the New64. IMM vR[2016] HCA 14, (2016) 257 CLR 300 at [49]. The case was decided with reference to divergent views of appealcourts in Victoria and New South Wales. The Victo......
-
A fair ‘hearing’
...The High Court of Australia recently conclusivelysettled the issue, affirming the approach adopted in New South Wales: IMM vThe Queen [2016] HCA 14. This approach wasrecently applied in Bayley vThe Queen [2016] VSCA 160.72. See, e.g., Bulejcik vR, n. 6 at 394–395, Toohey and Gaudron JJ sugg......