Imobilari Pty Ltd v Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Judgment Date | 17 December 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] FCA 1920 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia
...[2005] 2 Qd R 232 at 235 per Williams JA. 45 (2007) 160 FCR 298 at 309 [47]. See also Imobilari Pty Ltd v Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd (2008) 252 ALR 41. 46General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 at 128–130 per Barwick CJ; [1964] HCA 69. 47Dey v Vic......
-
Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia
...[2005] 2 Qd R 232 at 235 per Williams JA. 45 (2007) 160 FCR 298 at 309 [47]. See also Imobilari Pty Ltd v Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd (2008) 252 ALR 41. 46General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 at 128–130 per Barwick CJ; [1964] HCA 69. 47Dey v Vic......
-
Batterham v Nauer, in the matter of Peter James Batterham
...summary judgment and an order striking out a pleading (here, the ASOC) was discussed in Imobilari Pty Ltd v Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd [2008] FCA 1920; (2008) 252 ALR 41 at [3] to [8]; Oliver v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (No 1) [2011] FCA 1440 at [23] and J & A Vaughan Super Pty Lt......
-
Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union v Railtrain Pty Ltd
...judgment under s 31A. This difference was explained as follows by Finkelstein J in Imobilari Pty Ltd v Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd [2008] FCA 1920, (2008) 252 ALR 41 at 43 and 44: [4] The fundamental thing to understand about the strike-out rule, which the language of O 11 r 16 itself makes......
Request a trial to view additional results