In the Marriage of L & F

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Date2000
Year2000
CourtFamily Court (Australia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
36 cases
  • Australian Workers' Union of Employees, Queensland v Etheridge Shire Council
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • W v H And Another
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 29 February 2008
    ...of the contribution of a wife and mother. 53. In a decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia, Lynch v Fitzpatrick [2000] FamCA 1353 sub nom JEL and DDF [2001] FLC 93-075, dealing with the impact of White in Australia, and in particular in formulating and expressing guidanc......
  • Lambert v Lambert
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 November 2002
    ...relevance given the extent to which Mance LJ was influenced by Australian authority, and particularly the case of Lynch v Lynch [2000] FamCA 1353, [2001] FLC 93–075, in formulating and expressing guidance in the case of Cowan on the assessment of what constitutes an exceptional contribution......
  • Osf and Ojk
    • Australia
    • Federal Magistrates Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Constitutional Law and the Limits of Discretion in Family Property Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 44-1, March 2016
    • 1 March 2016
    ...and Bramley [2000] FLC 93-060 and Eufrosin and Eufrosin [2014] FamCAFC 191. 14 Cf Ferraro and Ferraro [1993] FLC 92-335; JEL and DDF [2001] FLC 93-075 (special contribution by entrepreneurial husbands) and Singerson and Joans [2014] FamCAFC 238 (wife treated as making much greater contribut......