Introduction
| Author | Murray Wesson |
| Position | Senior Lecturer, School of Law, the University of Western Australia |
| Pages | 1-15 |
INTRODUCTION
Dr Murray Wesson*
We live in unsettled times. In recent years, we have witnessed a spate of Islamist
terrorist atrocities, the resurgence of authoritarianism, increasing and
apparently intractable concerns about inequality, and a weakening of the liberal
consensus. In circumstances such as these, questions about executive power are
likely to be particularly relevant. As the Honourable Robert French AC notes in
his contribution to this special issue, anxieties about perceived threats to the
social order are capable of fuelling expansive approaches to executive power, as
the public seek the reassurance of ‘strong’ forms of government.1 On the other
hand, executive power, especially non-statutory executive power, is itself
anxiety provoking and may be a factor in democratic decay. In an oft-cited
observation in the
Communist Party Case
, Sir Owen Dixon noted that
‘[h]istory, and not only ancient history, shows that in countries where
democratic institutions have been unconstitutionally superseded, it had been
done not seldom by those holding the executive power.’2
In this light, it is perhaps unsurprising that executive power and its
attendant anxieties have featured prominently in many recent events. In the
United Kingdom, the Supreme Court found in
Miller
that the government
could not rely upon the prerogative to trigger withdrawal from the European
Union but required an Act of Parliament.3 This decision was welcomed by
some commentators on the basis that the prerogative is the ‘enemy of the
people’,4 but was also resisted by others due to the ‘unanimity, strength and
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
* Senior Lecturer, School of Law, the University of Western Australia. Many of the contributions to
this special issue of the
University of Western Australia Law Review
derive from an Executive Power
workshop held at the Institute of Advanced Studies, the University of Western Australia, on 7 April
2017. The workshop, and hence the special issue, would not have been possible without the generous
support of the Institute of Advanced Studies. I would also like to thank the University of Western
Australia Law School for financially supporting the production of the special issue, and Professor
Michael Blakeney as staff editor for his advice and encouragement. Finally, I would like to thank
Stephen Puttick for his excellent work as student editor.
1 ‘Executive Power in Australia – Nurtured and Bound in Anxiety’.
2
Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth
(1951) 83 CLR 1, 187.
3
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
[2017] UKSC 5 (24 January 2017).
4 Thomas Poole, ‘Losing our Religion? Public Law and Brexit’ on UK Constitutional Law Association,
UK Constitutional Law Blog
(2 Dec 2016) <https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/>.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations