Isbester v Knox City Council

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeKiefel,Bell,Keane,Nettle JJ.,Gageler J.
Judgment Date10 June 2015
Neutral Citation[2015] HCA 20
Docket NumberM19/2015
CourtHigh Court
Date10 June 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
57 cases
  • Questions Referred to the Court of Disputed Returns Pursuant to Section 376 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (CTH) Concerning Mr Robert John Day AO
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 5 April 2017
    ...HCA 22. 171 (1975) 132 CLR 270 at 280, 286. 172 See, eg, Ebner (2000) 205 CLR 337; Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135; [2015] HCA 20. 173 Ford (1916) 21 CLR 317 at 325; see also at 320–321, 335. 174 (2012) 248 CLR 156 at 184 [21], 237 [154]; [2012] HCA 23. 175 See also Public S......
  • Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 October 2019
    ...and Hayne JJ; [2000] HCA 48; Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135 at 146 [20]–[23] per Kiefel, Bell, Keane and Nettle JJ; [2015] HCA 20. ...
  • ZS v Sentence Administration Board
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 22 October 2018
    ...[2014] HCA 47; 315 ALR 1 Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34; 359 ALR 1 Isbester v Knox City Council [2015] HCA 20; 255 CLR 135 John Fairfax & Sons v Police Tribunal of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 465 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; 201 CLR 488 Kirk v ......
  • BMT19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 April 2022
    ...E Cooper Pty Ltd [1935] HCA 82; 54 CLR 200 FSG17 v Minister for Immigration [2020] FCAFC 29; 274 FCR 456 Isbester v Knox City Council [2015] HCA 20; 255 CLR 135 Minister for Home Affairs v DUA16 [2020] HCA 46; 95 ALJR 54 Minister for Immigration & Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; 26......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
  • The High Court bites local government review process
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 29 June 2015
    ...HIGH COURT OVERTURNS DECISION TO DESTROY DOG - ISBESTER V KNOX CITY COUNCIL [2015] HCA 20 The High Court has unanimously allowed an appeal from the Victorian Court of Appeal overturning a local government administrative panel process (similar in most respects to a decision taken by any loca......
  • Dyson Heydon decision: a refresher on managing conflicts of interest
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 4 January 2016
    ...one that must be considered in the legal, statutory and factual contexts in which the decision is made. (See Isbester v Knox City Council [2015] HCA 20.) I note here for completeness that the application of a judicial bias test to decision-makers other than judges must necessarily recognise......
  • Conflict and bias in dog attack case
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 15 November 2015
    ...Act) to order that a dog be destroyed was found to be contrary to natural justice in the High Court case of Isbester v Knox City Council [2015] HCA 20. The Isbester case The High Court in the Isbester case unanimously held that a fair minded observer might reasonably apprehend that a delega......
  • Queensland Government Bulletin - 17 June 2015
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 25 June 2015
    ...strategies are being implemented, and the extent to which services are already being provided. More... Cases Isbester v Knox City Council [2015] HCA 20 Appeal allowed with costs. Administrative law - Natural justice - Bias - Reasonable apprehension of bias - Incompatibility of roles - Where......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT