Jaensch v Coffey

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1984
Neutral Citation[1984] HCA 52,1984-0820 HCA E
Date1984
Year1984
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
104 cases
  • Kelly v Hennessy
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1996
    ...I.L.R.M. 689. Hinz v. Berry [1970] 2 Q.B. 40; [1970] 2 W.L.R. 684; [1970] 1 All E.R. 1074. Jaensch v. Coffey (1984) 115 C.L.R. 549; 54 A.L.R. 417. McLoughlin v. O'Brian [1983] 1 A.C. 410; [1982] 2 W.L.R. 982; [1982] 2 All E.R. 298. Mullally v. Bus Éireann éireann [1992] I.L.R.M. 722. Appeal......
  • Warren Harford v Electricity Supply Board
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 16 April 2021
    ...was sustained ‘through the medium of the eye or the ear without direct contact’. Certainly Brennan J, in his judgment in Jaensch v. Coffey 155 CLR 549, 567, recognised: ‘A psychiatric illness induced by mere knowledge of a distressing fact is not compensable; perception by the plaintiff of ......
  • Magnus v South Pacific Air Motive Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Fletcher v Commissioner of Public Works
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 21 February 2003
    ...for support on passages contained in a judgment of Brennan J. (as he then was) in the Australian High Court case of Jaensh v. Coffey (1984) 155 C.L.R. 549 in which that learned judge said as follows:- " A plaintiff may recover only if the psychiatric illness is the result of physical injury......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles