Jago v District Court (Nsw)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1989
Neutral Citation1989-1012 HCA B,[1989] HCA 46
Year1989
Date1989
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
476 cases
  • E. O'R v DPP
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1996
    ... ... 16 J.R./1994 THE HIGH COURT Synopsis: CONSTITUTION Personal rights ... BELL V DPP 1985 AC 937 LPB, IN RE 1990 91 CAR 359 JAGO V DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 1989 168 CLR 23 CONSTITUTION ... ...
  • Phong v Attorney-General (Cth)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Tisdall v Health Insurance Commission
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • R v Davis
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • What is a Stay Application in criminal cases?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 March 2022
    ...fairness incapable of being overcome, that it would amount to an abuse of process (Jago v The District Court of New South Wales and Ors [1989] HCA 46). With respect to prejudicial media publicity, Dupas v The Queen [2010] HCA 20 held that extensive pre-trial publicity is often common in cas......
  • What is a Stay Application in criminal cases?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 March 2022
    ...fairness incapable of being overcome, that it would amount to an abuse of process (Jago v The District Court of New South Wales and Ors [1989] HCA 46). With respect to prejudicial media publicity, Dupas v The Queen [2010] HCA 20 held that extensive pre-trial publicity is often common in cas......
10 books & journal articles