James Emitja v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | Northern Territory |
| Judge | Grant CJ,Kelly J:,Barr J: |
| Judgment Date | 21 October 2016 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
| Docket Number | FILE NO: No. CA 15 of 2015 (21419050) |
| Date | 21 October 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
-
BD(Appellant) v The Queen
...at common law involved knowledge of probable consequence of conduct: see R v Crabbe (1985) 156 CLR 464 at 469; Emitja v The Queen [2016] NTCCA 4 at [82]–[85] per Barr 31 Vallance v R (1961) 108 CLR 56 at 82. 32 The aspect of the duty to which the appellant drew attention in this case was th......
-
Hardy v Rigby
...8 January 2020. 3 Whitehurst v The Queen [2011] NTCCA 11 at [12]; Noakes v The Queen [2015] NTCCA 7 at [15] and [23]; Emitja v The Queen [2016] NTCCA 4; 39 NTLR 159 at [39] ( 4 [2003] NTSC 47. 5 [2003] NTCA 17; 141 A Crim R 437. 6 [2005] NTSC 86. 7 [2009] NTCCA 8 ( Carnese). 8 [2017] NTSC 6......
-
Anderson v Nicholas
...9; 20 NTLR 147; Demur v The Queen [2014] NTCCA 15; 255 A Crim R 144; Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321; Emitja v The Queen [2016] NTCCA 4; 262 A Crim R 126; Hasan v The Queen [2010] VSCA 352; 31 VR 28; House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499; Hunter R E v R [1988] HCA 35; 6......
-
Patrick v Rigby
...5 at [75]–[76]; see also, e.g., Liddy v R [2005] NTCCA 4 at [12] cited with approval in Morrow v The Queen [2013] NTCCA 7 at [36]. 50 [2016] NTCCA 4 at 51 This discount is actually closer to 14 percent than 10 percent. 52 See, e.g., JKL v The Queen [2011] NTCCA 7 at [28]. 53 [2011] NTCCA 7.......
Request a trial to view additional results