Jensen v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeWHEELAHAN J
Judgment Date19 March 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 358
Date19 March 2020
CourtFederal Court
Jensen v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 358

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Jensen v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 358


Appeals from:

Jensen v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2018] FCCA 2137; 337 FLR 191

Palframan v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2018] FCCA 2225

Goodwin v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2018] FCCA 2224



File numbers:



VID 1130 of 2018VID 1136 of 2018VID 1137 of 2018



Judge:

WHEELAHAN J



Date of judgment:

19 March 2020



Catchwords:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – appeals from the Federal Circuit Court – appeals by way of rehearing – whether actors engaged for the performance of a travelling theatrical show were independent contractors or employees – multi-factorial test of the totality of the parties’ relationship – indicia for distinguishing between independent contractors and employees – relevance of alleged casual employment on particular indicia – appellants were independent contractors – appeals dismissed.


EVIDENCE – application of Briginshaw or s 140(2) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) to the civil standard of proof – whether the preliminary issue of determining the independent contractor-employee distinction itself involves allegations of gravity – s 140(2) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) not applied in determining that preliminary issue.



Legislation:

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 45, 323, 340, 357, 536, 546 and 548

Federal Court of Australia Act 1979 (Cth) s 24(1)(d)



Cases cited:

ACE Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski and Others (2013) 209 FCR 146

AGL Victoria Pty Ltd v SPI Networks (Gas) Pty Ltd [2006] VSCA 173

Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Moroccanoil Israel Ltd (2018) 261 FCR 301

Allesch v Maunz (2000) 2003 CLR 172

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hall (2017) 269 IR 28

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hall (2018) 261 FCR 347

Australian Mutual Provident Society v Chaplin (1978) 18 ALR 385

Boensch v Pascoe (2019) 94 ALJR 112

Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424

Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336

Building Workers’ Industrial Union of Australia v Odco Pty Ltd (1991) 29 FCR 104

Climaze Holdings Pty Ltd v Dyson (1995) 13 WAR 487

Cohen & Co v Ockerby & Co Ltd (1917) 24 CLR 288

Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Producers and Citizen Co-operative Assurance Company of Australia Ltd (1931) 46 CLR 41

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1806

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (2015) 230 FCR 298

Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472

Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd (2017) 261 CLR 544

Ellis v Wallsend District Hospital (1989) 17 NSWLR 553

Fair Work Ombudsman v Ecosway Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 296

Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth Holdings Pty Ltd (2015) 228 FCR 346

Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth Holdings Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 137

Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Barrett (1973) 129 CLR 395

Federal Commissioner of Taxation v J Walter Thompson (Australia) Pty Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 227

Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118

Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 395

Hall (Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer [1992] 1 WLR 939

Hollis v Vabu (2001) 207 CLR 21

Liquor Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union v Arnotts Biscuits Limited (2010) 188 FCR 221

London Australia Investment Company Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1977) 138 CLR 106

Lopez v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2005) 43 FCR 574

NM Superannuation Pty Ltd v Young (1993) 41 FCR 182

Marshall v Whittaker’s Building Supply Company (1963) 109 CLR 210

Massey v Crown Life Insurance Co [1978] 1 WLR 678

Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations v Gribbles Radiology Pty Ltd (2005) 222 CLR 194

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 357 ALR 408

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507

Narich Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Pay-Roll Tax [1983] 2 NSWLR 597

Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 110 ALR 449

On Call Interpreters and Translators Agency Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (No 3) (2011) 214 FCR 82

Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297

Patrick Stevedores v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (2019) 286 IR 52

Qantas Airways Limited v Gama (2008) 167 FCR 537

R v Foster; Ex parte Commonwealth Life (Amalgamated) Assurances Ltd (1952) 85 CLR 138

Re Australian Industrial Relations Commission; ex parte Australian Transport Officers Federation (1990) 171 CLR 216

Re Porter; Re Transport Workers Union of Australia (1989) 34 IR 179

Robinson Helicopter Company Inc v McDermott (2016) 331 ALR 550

Roy Morgan Research Centre Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (1997) 37 ATT 528

Roy Morgan Centre Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2010) 184 FCR 448

Setka v Gregor (No 2) (2011) 195 FCR 203

Sparks v Hobson (2018) 361 ALR 115

Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Company Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16

Tattsbet Ltd v Morrow (2015) 233 FCR 46

Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531

Western Australia v Ward (2002) 203 CLR 172

Whitby v ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1934

Wotton v State of Queensland (No 5) (2015) 352 ALR 146

Zuijs v Wirth Bros Pty Ltd (1955) 93 CLR 561



Date of hearing:

14 March 2019



Registry:

Victoria



Division:

Fair Work



National Practice Area:

Employment & Industrial Relations



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

133



Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr M Irving QC



Solicitor for the Appellant:

Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance



Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr B Shaw



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Dwyer & Co Legal



ORDERS


VID 1136 of 2018

BETWEEN:

CHRISTOPHER JOHN PALFRAMAN

Appellant


AND:

CULTURAL INFUSION (INT) PTY LTD

Respondent



JUDGE:

WHEELAHAN J

DATE OF ORDER:

19 march 2020



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The appeal be dismissed.

  2. If any order for costs is sought by a party, that party shall file and serve written submissions in relation to costs not exceeding three pages by 4.00pm on Thursday, 26 March 2020, with any responding submissions to be filed by 4.00pm on Thursday 2 April 2020.

  3. If no submissions seeking costs are filed by 4.00pm on Thursday, 26 March 2020, there be no order as to costs.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.





ORDERS


VID 1130 of 2018

BETWEEN:

SOREN JENSEN

Appellant


AND...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 11)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 November 2020
    ...v Topero Nominees Pty Ltd [2013] FWCFB 6321; 238 IR 42 Hollis v Vabu [2001] HCA 44; 207 CLR 21 Jensen v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 358 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; 101 CLR 298 Kowalczuk v Accom Finance Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 343; 77 NSWLR 205 Lamb v Cotogno [1987] HCA 47; 164 ......
  • Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 17 July 2020
    ...[2001] NSWCA 125; (2001) 105 IR 66 Jamsek v ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 1934 Jensen v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 358 Johnson v Lindsay & Co [1891] AC 371 Johnson v MNG Investments t/as Australian Temporary Fencing [2011] ACTSC 124 Kirk v Industrial Court of ......
  • Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 31 August 2021
    ...FCA 362 at [68]. 83 See, eg, ACE Insurance Ltd v Trifunovski (2013) 209 FCR 146 at 174 [107]; Jensen v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 358 at 84 See Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2020) 279 FCR 631 at 636 [8], 637 [11]–[......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Are actors independent contractors or employees?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 9 June 2020
    ...recent case of Jensen v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 358, the Federal Court rejected the appeal by three actors to be deemed casual employees rather than independent contractors - a decision that will have wide-ranging implications for the live performance The facts The actors......