Jenyns v Public Curator (Queensland)

JurisdictionQueensland
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1953] HCA 2,1953-0227 HCA A
Year1953
Date1953

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
61 cases
  • Newacres Sdn Bhd v Sri Alam Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Productivity Partners Pty Ltd (trading as Captain Cook College) (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 2 July 2021
    ...Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Pty Ltd [1984] FCA 167; 2 FCR 82 Google Inc v ACCC [2013] HCA 1; 249 CLR 435 Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) [1953] HCA 2; 90 CLR 113 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; 101 CLR 298 The Juliana (1822) 2 Dods 504 Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2013] HCA 25; 250 CLR 392 Kra......
  • Thorne v Kennedy
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 November 2017
    ...at 654, Dixon J agreeing; [1948] HCA 20. 73 (1992) 175 CLR 621 at 649–650. 74 (2013) 250 CLR 392 at 426 [122]. See also at 401 [18]. 75 (1953) 90 CLR 113 at 118–119; [1953] HCA 2. 76Thorne & Kennedy [2015] FCCA 484 at [85]. 77Thorne & Kennedy [2015] FCCA 484 at [68]. 78 (1998) 194 CLR 395 a......
  • Good Living Company Pty Ltd as trustee for the Warren Duncan Trust No 3 v Kingsmede Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 March 2021
    ...v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; 151 CLR 447 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Kojic [2016] FCAFC 186; 249 FCR 421 Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) [1953] HCA 2; 90 CLR 113 Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited [2013] HCA 25; 250 CLR 392 Monroe Topple & Associates Pty Ltd v Institute of Chartered Accountant......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • High Court pounces on predatory lending practices
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 20 April 2022
    ...at 401-402 [20] 5 Jeffrey William Stubbings v JAMS 2 Pty Ltd & Ors [2022] HCA 6 at [39] 6Ibid at [49] 7Ibid at [49] 8 Ibid at [39] 9 (1953) 90 CLR 113 at 118 - The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about ......
5 books & journal articles
  • CONSUMER PROTECTION, STATUTE AND
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...1 All ER 303 (CA)). 95Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd[2013] HCA 25; (2013) 250 CLR 392 at 426, [122], citing Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld)(1953) 90 CLR 113 at 118–119, per Dixon CJ and McTiernan and Kitto JJ. 96Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Scully[2013] VSCA 292; (2013) 303 ALR 168 ......
  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v. C.G. Berbatis Holdings Pty. Ltd.; curbing unconscionability: Berbatis in the High Court of Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 28 No. 1, April 2004
    • 1 April 2004
    ...(2003) 197 ALR 153, 179. (77) (1822) 2 Dods 504, 522; 165 ER 1560, 1567 (Lord Stowell), quoted in Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) (1953) 90 CLR 113, 119 (Dixon CJ, McTiernan and Kitto (78) See, eg, Berbatis (2003) 197 ALR 154, 167, 169 (Gummow and Hayne JJ), 192, 199 (Callinan J). (79) Ibid 1......
  • UNCERTAINTY IN PRIVATE LAW: RHETORICAL DEVICE OR SUBSTANTIVE LEGAL ARGUMENT?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 1, August 2021
    • 1 August 2021
    ...Act 2001 (Cth) ss 12CA-12CC. (72) The Juliana (1822) 2 Dods 504; 165 ER 1560, 1567 (Lord Stowell). See Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) (1953) 90 CLR 113, 118-19 (Dixon CJ, McTiernan and Kitto JJ), citing Lord Stowell's statement with approval: at 119. See also Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2......
  • PRIVATE LAW, CONSCIENCE AND MORAL REASONING: THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 46 No. 1, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...114; Justice James Allsop, 'Statutes and Equity' [2019] Federal Judicial Scholarship 16 , archived at ; Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) (1953) 90 CLR 113, 118-19 (Dixon CJ, McTiernan and Kitto JJ) ('Jenyns'). Note that the demands of conscience might also apply to a plaintiff's conduct in app......
  • Get Started for Free