Johnson v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1976-0826 HCA A,[1976] HCA 44
Year1976
Date1976

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 cases
  • R v Falconer
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Braysich v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 May 2011
    ...681–682; [1964] AC 1369 at 1392. 49 See eg Sodeman v The King (1936) 55 CLR 192 at 216 per Dixon J; [1936] HCA 75; Johnson v The Queen (1976) 136 CLR 619 at 644 per Barwick CJ, 653–654 per Gibbs J, 660 per Mason J agreeing; [1976] HCA 50Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 at 167–168 per......
  • Heron v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 April 2003
    ...to the provocation. 80 (1997) 191 CLR 334. 81 (1997) 191 CLR 334 at 367-368. 82 (1995) 183 CLR 58 at 66-67. 83Johnson v The Queen (1976) 136 CLR 619 at 639 per Barwick 84 (1997) 191 CLR 334 at 368. 85 See generally McHugh J's comments in Masciantonio (1995) 183 CLR 58 at 72-74: cf Yeo, ‘Sex......
  • Veen v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Homicide law reform and gender: Configuring violence
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminology (formerly Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology) No. 45-3, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...and Women’s Experience in Court: TheImplementation of Feminist Reforms in Civil Proceedings. Amherst, New York: Cambria Press.Johnson (1976) 136 CLR 619.Kissane K (2006) Silent Death: The Killing of Julie Ramage. Sydney: Hodder.Krope (Unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, 15/08/1978).Lake ......