Jolley v Mainka
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1933 |
| Neutral Citation | 1933-0831 HCA B,[1933] HCA 43 |
| Year | 1933 |
| Date | 1933 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Ffrost v Stevenson (1937) 58 CLR 528
...is by way of mandate. [DIXON J referred to R v Christian 14 (1924) App D (S Af) 101. [LATHAM CJ referred to Jolley v Mainka 15 (1933) 49 CLR 242 at 250.] The scope of s122 of the Constitution was dealt with in Buchanan v The Commonwealth 16 (1913) 16 CLR 315, R v Bernasconi 17 (1915) 19 CLR......
- Commonwealth v Tasmania (The Tasmanian Dam Case)
-
Bennett v Commonwealth of Australia
...s 122 of the Constitution as subject to ss 55, 80 and 71 of the Constitution respectively, but in each case refused to do so. 186 In Jolley v Mainka207, the Court considered the Commonwealth's power over the Territory of New Guinea, which was governed by Australia pursuant to a mandate of t......
-
Commonwealth of Australia v State of Tasmania
...has been held to support legislation for the acceptance and government of the Mandated Territory of New Guinea (Jolley v MainkaUNK (1933) 49 CLR 242 at 250, 281, 286), for the reciprocal surrender of persons charged with criminal offences (Ffrost v StevensonUNK (1937) 58 CLR 528 at 557), to......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
...it has been argued that these territories should have been regarded as falling under s 51(xxix) rather than s 122. See Jolley v Mainka (1933) 49 CLR 242, 278–9 (Evatt J); Ffrost v Stevenson (1937) 58 CLR 528, 579–93 (Evatt J); but cf 555 (Latham CJ), 566 (Dixon J); Fishwick v Cleland (1960)......