Jones v Bartlett

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGleeson CJ, Gaudron J, McHugh J, Gummow, Hayne JJ, Kirby J, Callinan J
Judgment Date16 Nov 2000
Neutral Citation[2000] HCA 56, 2000-1116 HCA A
Docket NumberP59/1999
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
85 cases
  • The President of Majlis Perbandaran Tawau v Amiruddin bin Rasake & 245 Ors (and Another Appeal)
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2017
  • Hoyts Pty Ltd v Burns
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 October 2003
    ...DCJ (‘Reasons of the primary judge’) at 20. 9Maclenan v Segar [1917] 2 KB 325 at 332-333. 10Watson v George (1953) 89 CLR 409 at 424; cf Jones v Bartlett (2000) 205 CLR 166 at 196 11 As in Hackshaw v Shaw (1984) 155 CLR 614; Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1985) 156 ......
  • Imbree v McNeilly; McNeilly v Imbree
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 28 August 2008
    ...v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 179 CLR 520 at 541–544, 547–548; [1994] HCA 13; Jones v Bartlett (2000) 205 CLR 166 at 237 [244]; [2000] HCA 56. 161 Joint reasons at [61]–[65]. 163 As in Joyce (1948) 77 CLR 39 and Cook (1986) 162 CLR 376. 164 As in Lamb v Cotogno (1987) 164 CLR 1; [1987] 16......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 firm's commentaries
  • Dodgy repair, drastic injury: residential occupier not liable
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 28 June 2015
    ...as landlord (and thereby did not rely on the principles expounded in Northern Sandblasting Pty Ltd v Harris 188 CLR 313; Jones v Bartlett (2000) HCA 56 and Sakoua v Williams NSWCA 405). Further, the appellant abandoned her appeal in relation to breaches of the Residential Tenancy Agreement ......
  • Does A Landlord Owe a Duty of Care Due to The Changing Need of Residents?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 May 2010
    ...Sackville AJA 2 (1997) 188 CLR 313 3 (1997) 188 CLR 313 at 358 4 (2000) 205 CLR 166 at 215 5 [2007] NSWCA 69 6 [2010] NSWCA 91 at [30] 7 (2000) HCA 56 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your spec......
  • Occupiers' liability: the landlord, the owners corporation, the criminal and the entrant
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 March 2015
    ...claims handlers should be aware of these. Landlord's duty of care dependent on amount of control over premises Since Jones v Bartlett [2000] HCA 56; 205 CLR 166, there has been no doubt that a landlord owes a general duty to take care. What steps are required to discharge that duty depends ......
  • Beware of falling branches : Rhodes v Lake Macquarie City Council & Anor [2010] NSWCA 235
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 5 October 2010
    ...any breach is causative of the loss claimed, which is often difficult as shown in this decision. Hodgson JA, Macfarlan JA and Handley AJA [2000] HCA 56 Ranked No 1 - Australia's fastest growing law firm' (Legal Partnership Survey, The Australian July The content of this article is intended ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results