Judd v Mckeon

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1926] HCA 33,1926-1011 HCA B
Date1926
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Faderson v Bridger
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Cunliffe v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Spence v Queensland
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 Mayo 2019
    ...Ex parte Daniell (1920) 28 CLR 23 at 31 per Knox CJ, Isaacs, Gavan Duffy, Powers, Rich and Starke JJ; [1920] HCA 24; Judd v McKeon (1926) 38 CLR 380 at 383 per Knox CJ, Gavan Duffy and Starke JJ; [1926] HCA 33; Langer v The Commonwealth (1996) 186 CLR 302 at 317 per Brennan CJ; [1996] HCA 4......
  • Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 Septiembre 2004
    ...CLR 140 at 183 per Dawson J. In relation to the issue of universal suffrage, see at 244 per McHugh J, 283 per Gummow J. 54Judd v McKeon (1926) 38 CLR 380; see McGinty (1996) 186 CLR 140 at 283 per Gummow 55McGinty (1996) 186 CLR 140 at 244 per McHugh J, 283 per Gummow J. 56McGinty (1996) 18......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Can you go to jail for not voting in Australia?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 28 Febrero 2023
    ...in past cases, if any. One of the leading cases covering this issue is the decision of the High Court of Australia in Judd v. McKeon [1926] HCA 33, where Justice Isaacs "A "valid and sufficient reason" means some reason which is not excluded by law, and is in the circumstances a reasonable ......
2 books & journal articles
  • LOCATING PLEBISCITES IN THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 46 No. 1, December 2022
    • 1 Diciembre 2022
    ...democracy has long been recognised: Smith v Oldham (1912) 15 CLR 355, 358 (Griffith CJ), 361 (Barton J), 362 (Isaacs J); Judd v McKeon (1926) 38 CLR 380, 383 (Knox CJ, Gavan Duffy and Starke JJ), 385 (Isaacs J) (Judd). See also Chief Justice Murray Gleeson, 'The Shape of Representative Demo......
  • Constitutional Implications from Representative Democracy
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 23-1, March 1995
    • 1 Marzo 1995
    ...seatsinaStatedidnotinfringe the s24requirementthatmembersbedirectly chosenbythe164(1993) 177 CLR 541at560-561.165JuddvMcKeon(1926) 38 CLR 380, alsoFadersonvBridger(1971) 126 CLR 271.166See especiallyBakervCarr369 US 186 (1962);GrayvSanders372 US 368 (1963);WesberryvSanders376 US 1(1964);Rey......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT